User talk:FactZheker: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
FactZheker (talk | contribs) |
FactZheker (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I recently had an entire edit that included cited sources and links deleted. I suspect it was politically oriented as any perceived biased language could have been edited out while maintaining the integrity of the factual information that was added. I need to request a review of the admin activity of account drmies<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Drmies</ref>. He appears to be a political operative and has deleted tens of thousands of edits and has blocked tens of thousands of users. How do I request a review? [[User:FactZheker|FactZheker]] ([[User talk:FactZheker#top|talk]]) 23:57, 14 January 2021 (UTC) |
I recently had an entire edit that included cited sources and links deleted. I suspect it was politically oriented as any perceived biased language could have been edited out while maintaining the integrity of the factual information that was added. I need to request a review of the admin activity of account drmies<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Drmies</ref>. He appears to be a political operative and has deleted tens of thousands of edits and has blocked tens of thousands of users. How do I request a review? [[User:FactZheker|FactZheker]] ([[User talk:FactZheker#top|talk]]) 23:57, 14 January 2021 (UTC) |
||
{{Reflist-talk}} |
{{Reflist-talk}} |
||
== January 2021 == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|left|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello FactZheker. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure|mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements]]. Paid advocacy is a category of [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|conflict of interest]] (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] and what [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|Wikipedia is not]], and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to [[Spamdexing|black-hat search-engine optimization]]. |
|||
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]] of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|articles for creation]] process, rather than directly. |
|||
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are '''<u>required</u> by the [[wmf:TOU|Wikimedia Terms of Use]] to disclose your employer, client and affiliation.''' You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at [[User:FactZheker]]. The template {{tl|Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{tlc|paid|2=user=FactZheker|3=employer=<var>InsertName</var>|4=client=<var>InsertName</var>}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, '''do not edit further''' until you answer this message. {{Z159}}<!-- Template:Uw-paid1 --> '''[[User:Sam Sailor|Sam]] [[User talk:Sam Sailor|Sailor]]''' 04:00, 15 January 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Not receiving compensation, this is purely pro bono as I was testing the waters but now feel that it be a much better venture if I work to expose the political censorship and biased omission. [[User:FactZheker|FactZheker]] ([[User talk:FactZheker#top|talk]]) 04:09, 15 January 2021 (UTC)FactZheker |
|||
[[User:Sam Sailer|Sam]] I have updated in accordance with the terms of service, though it wasn't necessary at all as no compensation is received from my clients as further explained in my "About Me" section. I still have not received any response as to what specifically about the information I added was untrue and unworthy of being included in a Wiki Bio. I checked the Terms and looked at the rules, nothing I posted violated any of it. I would like a list, line by line of what was untrue, irreparably biased, or defamatory in the things that I sourced. Please don't cry to another one of your friends like the other people did after refusing to address the concerns I've raised directly. [[User:FactZheker|FactZheker]] ([[User talk:FactZheker#top|talk]]) 05:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)FactZheker |
|||
Revision as of 18:57, 15 January 2021
Help me!
 | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Please help me with...
Politically Motivated Deletion
I recently had an entire edit that included cited sources and links deleted. I suspect it was politically oriented as any perceived biased language could have been edited out while maintaining the integrity of the factual information that was added. I need to request a review of the admin activity of account drmies[1]. He appears to be a political operative and has deleted tens of thousands of edits and has blocked tens of thousands of users. How do I request a review? FactZheker (talk) 23:57, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
References