Jump to content

Talk:Stations in West Hampstead: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
closing RM discussion; no consensus to move page
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Move|West Hampstead railway stations}}
{{reqmapin|England}}
{{reqmapin|England}}


Line 17: Line 16:


== Requested move 2==
== Requested move 2==
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:polltop -->
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the {{{type|proposal}}}. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. ''

{{{result|The result of the debate was}}} '''NO CONSENSUS''' to move page to suggested title, per discussion below. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 00:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
[[West Hampstead railway station]] → [[West Hampstead railway stations]] — I just want to be on the safe side and have this as a provisional name, also there is more than one station here. Hopefully this should not turn out like the last one until this is much nearer the tie. [[User:Simply south|Simply south]] 18:55, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
[[West Hampstead railway station]] → [[West Hampstead railway stations]] — I just want to be on the safe side and have this as a provisional name, also there is more than one station here. Hopefully this should not turn out like the last one until this is much nearer the tie. [[User:Simply south|Simply south]] 18:55, 1 January 2007 (UTC)


Line 32: Line 35:
In Nov 2007, the 'station formerly known as West End Lane' becomes part of London Overground; and the two stations will be split naturally since this one will no longer be a 'National rail' station. Further, is it reasonable to expect editors to remember this is the exception to the rule, that a station is called "xxx railway station", even when there are multiple examples. [[User:Kbthompson|Kbthompson]] 11:27, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
In Nov 2007, the 'station formerly known as West End Lane' becomes part of London Overground; and the two stations will be split naturally since this one will no longer be a 'National rail' station. Further, is it reasonable to expect editors to remember this is the exception to the rule, that a station is called "xxx railway station", even when there are multiple examples. [[User:Kbthompson|Kbthompson]] 11:27, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
:London Overground will be a National Rail service administered by TfL. --[[User:88.110.235.235|88.110.235.235]] 01:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
:London Overground will be a National Rail service administered by TfL. --[[User:88.110.235.235|88.110.235.235]] 01:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:pollbottom -->


==Map or plan==
==Map or plan==

Revision as of 00:23, 15 January 2007

Page move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was not moved. When/if the expansion is made, then the move will be considered. Joelito (talk) 13:48, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


We shouldn't name things contrary to our naming convention until they actually become the new type, I would have thought.
James F. (talk) 09:47, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS to move page to suggested title, per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 00:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC) West Hampstead railway stationWest Hampstead railway stations — I just want to be on the safe side and have this as a provisional name, also there is more than one station here. Hopefully this should not turn out like the last one until this is much nearer the tie. Simply south 18:55, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

Survey - Support votes

Survey - Oppose votes

  1. Oppose - the 'railway station' suffix is as near-universal as makes no difference, and even if the stations are to be knocked together, there will still be separate entries for the three former stations. Maybe turn 'West Hampstead railway station' into a disambig page with redirects to four separate pages (the two BR stations, the LUL station and the proposed union station)? Iridescenti 02:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose - They should probably be split into separate articles. The plan to "merge" the stations actually consists of building a few long footbridges between the various platforms. They'll still mostly be separate. --88.110.235.235 01:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Add any additional comments:

In Nov 2007, the 'station formerly known as West End Lane' becomes part of London Overground; and the two stations will be split naturally since this one will no longer be a 'National rail' station. Further, is it reasonable to expect editors to remember this is the exception to the rule, that a station is called "xxx railway station", even when there are multiple examples. Kbthompson 11:27, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

London Overground will be a National Rail service administered by TfL. --88.110.235.235 01:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Map or plan

Understanding this article would be helped with a map, plan or diagram of the station(s), and a {{coor}} link to allow readers to find maps and satellite images of it/them. --Scott Davis Talk 07:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]