User talk:Jack Frost

You may want to increment {{Archive basics}} to |counter= 4 as User talk:Jack Frost/Archive 3 is larger than the recommended 150Kb.

San Diego Conquistadors move

While I do support the move, in the act of moving, you wound up deleting the talk page from the redirect, which constrained multiple threads as to why the pages for the Conquistadors and the Sails were merged in the first place over the vociferous but factually bereft claims of the editor who split them in the first place. Regardless of which title the merged article sits at (and I do think the longer-lived name for the team is the right choice), those threads are important to preserve because the errors remain on the current talk page. Any chance that deleted talk page could be restored as an archive? oknazevad (talk) 18:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Oknazevad, apologies, I missed your message. It was a round-robin pageswap; so the articles and talkpages switched from one title to the other and it all looks present to me? Talk:San Diego Sails and Talk:San Diego Conquistadors both still seem to exist, and I can't see that anyone fixed it in the meantime, or have I missed something? Jack Frost (talk) 03:09, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I see that now. All good. oknazevad (talk) 08:59, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Sophia Smith

You closed the move request at Talk:Sophia Smith last week but the page was never moved Joeykai (talk) 04:22, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Joeykai, I have no idea what happened there, thanks for letting me know!

Sophia Smith --> Sophia Smith (Smith College) and Sophia Smith (disambiguation) --> Sophia Smith completed. I also did a pass to switch relevant wikilinks from Sophia Smith --> Sophia Smith (Smith College). I think that about wraps it up. Jack Frost (talk) 04:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Prince Albert Victor

Hi Jack Frost. You reversed my edit on Prince Albert Victor's page about his potential marriages, specifically the failed match between him and his first cousin, Alix (future Empress of Russia). I was confused because I cited all of them with relevant books and checked it to have relevant information, such as that his grandmother Queen Victoria facilitated the match and arranged for the two cousins to meet, and that Alix ended it, and that Albert Victor was confused and tried to convince Alix otherwise until he met Helene d'Orleans. May I ask why you reversed my edit and what I should keep in mind for future edits?

Jjadaran24 (talk) 14:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Jjadaran24

Jjadaran24, apologies; your note was mixed into another topic on my talkpage and I missed it. I reverted your edit as it appeared to be a significant change to the prose and tone to something less encyclopaedic. It looks like, in the intervening time, the change has been worked into the article and it looks good. Apologies if it was more jarring than intended, and thankyou for your improvements to aristocracy articles, it's a fascinating subject. Jack Frost (talk) 03:18, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Your Turn To die

hey lmao can you change it back i wanna do a joke abt it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:805:8580:DF40:15B3:961A:2C4D:91AE (talk) 01:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

No. Jack Frost (talk) 01:07, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

What the...? El_C 16:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

El C, boring vandalism by a boring vandal on a page by that title. Nothing to worry about. Jack Frost (talk) 02:49, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Fantasy spam

Hey, speaking of Discworld —I only have one book in Hebrew (and none in English) and that is Sourcery, which I love and find super-funny— but what I was gonna ask you was: have you seen any episodes of the BBC's The Watch? Because I watched the pilot and was, like, meh. Just wandering if I should give episode 2 a chance... El_C 16:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

El C, I have. I'm a big Discworld fan, and I was sorely disappointed by the TV series; I made it halfway through an episode and turned it off. But I also acknowledge that anything other than a faithful scene-by-scene recreation of the books was not likely to win me over, and they changed so much it was virtually unrecognisable... Jack Frost (talk) 02:46, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Well, I did manage to dredge through the entire pilot episode, and yeah, it pretty much sucked. As mentioned, I've only read Sourcery, so I don't think I'd have picked up on whether it was a faithful adaptation of the source material. But I'd hoped it would be fun and funny like the book — sadly, it proved to be a huge missed opportunity. El_C 09:26, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Review of Draft:Applied Intuition

Hello! One of my drafts (Draft:Applied Intuition) has been unreviewed for quite some time, I was wondering if you could take a look? RajeshKumar12 (talk) 16:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

rereview of draft Tanner rozankovic

I am taking a re-review request for the article that I'm working on, "Tanner Rozankovic" because I believe this biography about Tanner is worth an article due to public interest, for this person and that according to wiki guides this person is suitable for an article. In summary here is why I believe Tanner Rozankovic fits the requirements for an article/biography. From years 2016-2021 the name Tanner Rozankovic has been searched on google over 15 thousand times per 3 months, according to Google ranking sites. Tanner Rozankovic has had a wide range of media coverage calculating to videos all together over 6 million views, with Tanner's games and Tanner being the sole interest and focus of these videos. With big YouTubers making playlists with multiple videos just about Tanner, and the biggest twitch steamer to exist "Shroud" even mentioning and playing Tanner's games on videos and live streams, with hundreds of thousands of viewers watching live.

Tanner can be found with sufficient coverage from many notable and respectable sources, from the Valve cooperation all the way to EA Sports and DICE Studios some of the biggest publishing and developing companies to ever exist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Tanner_Rozankovic

Kind regards, Joshua Gooden