User talk:Awesomdude: Difference between revisions
Don't sweat it |
Awesomdude (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==[[Wgwag]]== |
==[[Wgwag]]== |
||
Please don't take the attempt to delete this article personally. You're obviously trying to add to the encylopedia, and I know it's frustrating to see people undoing your work. My suggestion is to spend a little time bumming around the project and you'll pretty quickly get the hang of it. The important thing is not to get discouraged and don't take stuff personally.--[[User:Kubigula|Kubigula]] <i>([[User talk:Kubigula|talk]])</i> 05:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC) |
Please don't take the attempt to delete this article personally. You're obviously trying to add to the encylopedia, and I know it's frustrating to see people undoing your work. My suggestion is to spend a little time bumming around the project and you'll pretty quickly get the hang of it. The important thing is not to get discouraged and don't take stuff personally.--[[User:Kubigula|Kubigula]] <i>([[User talk:Kubigula|talk]])</i> 05:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
No. |
|||
It is clearly ridiculous. Someone lame-ass wiki troll simply called in his friends and had them all vote 'nay' on the article. |
|||
Look. If you are going to accept user generated content, do so. If not, simply reserve this freedom for academics. |
|||
I do not doubt that this draconian bullying is a notable cause for wikipedia's poor showing in the fundraising department, notwithstanding its huge traffic. |
|||
Revision as of 06:02, 17 January 2007
Please don't take the attempt to delete this article personally. You're obviously trying to add to the encylopedia, and I know it's frustrating to see people undoing your work. My suggestion is to spend a little time bumming around the project and you'll pretty quickly get the hang of it. The important thing is not to get discouraged and don't take stuff personally.--Kubigula (talk) 05:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
No.
It is clearly ridiculous. Someone lame-ass wiki troll simply called in his friends and had them all vote 'nay' on the article.
Look. If you are going to accept user generated content, do so. If not, simply reserve this freedom for academics.
I do not doubt that this draconian bullying is a notable cause for wikipedia's poor showing in the fundraising department, notwithstanding its huge traffic.