Jump to content

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Automated Tropical Cyclone Forecasting System/1: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
add on
Response. How can I fix an issue I can't detect?
Line 8: Line 8:


Just to add on which [[WP:GAC|criteria]] the article doesn't meet anymore is 3a, which is "address the main aspects of the topic".&nbsp;[[User:Nova Crystallis|<span style="font-family: Segoe UI; color: #617aa3">Nova Crystallis</span>]] [[User talk:Nova Crystallis|<span style="font-family: Segoe UI; color: #92aafd">(Talk)</span>]] 23:40, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Just to add on which [[WP:GAC|criteria]] the article doesn't meet anymore is 3a, which is "address the main aspects of the topic".&nbsp;[[User:Nova Crystallis|<span style="font-family: Segoe UI; color: #617aa3">Nova Crystallis</span>]] [[User talk:Nova Crystallis|<span style="font-family: Segoe UI; color: #92aafd">(Talk)</span>]] 23:40, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
:Since I can't view the edit history of that article, I have no idea from where/wence that content came. It's a serious catch 22, no? [[User:Thegreatdr|Thegreatdr]] ([[User talk:Thegreatdr|talk]]) 02:30, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:30, 12 May 2021

Automated Tropical Cyclone Forecasting System

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result pending

So I reviewed this article under an old username five years ago, and I rubber stamped it as I thought there were no issues. The me five years ago was also not aware of the whole section describing each deck used close paraphrasing in its entirety. Personally, I am not sure this article still passes the GA criteria with a large part of the material gone, so this is why I'm starting a community reassessment. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 23:34, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add on which criteria the article doesn't meet anymore is 3a, which is "address the main aspects of the topic". Nova Crystallis (Talk) 23:40, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since I can't view the edit history of that article, I have no idea from where/wence that content came. It's a serious catch 22, no? Thegreatdr (talk) 02:30, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]