Talk:Vixens (manga): Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 45.56.1.106 - "" |
Extremepro (talk | contribs) Technical De-PROD |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
Um. I <i>really</i> think the link to this page should go to a disambiguation; searching [the plural for female foxes] shouldn't lead to the <i>porn</i> article instead of the netball article or the article on foxes. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/45.56.1.106|45.56.1.106]] ([[User talk:45.56.1.106#top|talk]]) 22:50, 20 December 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Um. I <i>really</i> think the link to this page should go to a disambiguation; searching [the plural for female foxes] shouldn't lead to the <i>porn</i> article instead of the netball article or the article on foxes. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/45.56.1.106|45.56.1.106]] ([[User talk:45.56.1.106#top|talk]]) 22:50, 20 December 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
==Technical De-PROD== |
|||
From [[WP:PROD]]: PROD is one-shot only: It must not be used for pages PRODed before or previously discussed at AfD or FfD. |
|||
The article was de-prodded back in 2011 - so doesn't that mean the PROD is now invalid? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vixens&diff=415729433&oldid=415728950 |
|||
Found archived Mania review of the OVA: https://web.archive.org/web/20110307114911/http://www.mania.com/vixens_article_75649.html |
|||
The other review of this is "Visionary", pg 733, The anime encyclopedia: a guide to Japanese animation since 1917, McCarthy & Clement 2007 - which would make it pass [[WP:BK]] #1 - the issue is getting the actual book to read the review. [[User:Extremepro|Extremepro]] ([[User talk:Extremepro|talk]]) 13:33, 12 May 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:33, 12 May 2021
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Um. I really think the link to this page should go to a disambiguation; searching [the plural for female foxes] shouldn't lead to the porn article instead of the netball article or the article on foxes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.56.1.106 (talk) 22:50, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Technical De-PROD
From WP:PROD: PROD is one-shot only: It must not be used for pages PRODed before or previously discussed at AfD or FfD.
The article was de-prodded back in 2011 - so doesn't that mean the PROD is now invalid? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vixens&diff=415729433&oldid=415728950
Found archived Mania review of the OVA: https://web.archive.org/web/20110307114911/http://www.mania.com/vixens_article_75649.html
The other review of this is "Visionary", pg 733, The anime encyclopedia: a guide to Japanese animation since 1917, McCarthy & Clement 2007 - which would make it pass WP:BK #1 - the issue is getting the actual book to read the review. Extremepro (talk) 13:33, 12 May 2021 (UTC)