Talk:Smiths: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m moved Talk:Smiths (disambiguation) to Talk:Smiths: disambiguation page to main title. See talk page for discussion. |
closing RM discussion; page moved |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{move|Smiths}} |
|||
== Requested move == |
== Requested move == |
||
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:polltop --> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the {{{type|proposal}}}. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. '' |
|||
{{{result|The result of the debate was}}} '''PAGE MOVED''' per discussion below. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 19:49, 22 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
<hr/> |
|||
[[Smiths (disambiguation)]] → [[Smiths]] — Listen, I like [[the Smiths]], too, but [[Smiths]] should be a disambiguation page. —[[User:N328KF|Joseph/N328KF]] [[User talk:N328KF|(Talk)]] 22:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC) |
[[Smiths (disambiguation)]] → [[Smiths]] — Listen, I like [[the Smiths]], too, but [[Smiths]] should be a disambiguation page. —[[User:N328KF|Joseph/N328KF]] [[User talk:N328KF|(Talk)]] 22:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 21: | ||
===Discussion=== |
===Discussion=== |
||
:''Add any additional comments:'' |
:''Add any additional comments:'' |
||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:pollbottom --> |
|||
Revision as of 19:49, 22 January 2007
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 19:49, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Smiths (disambiguation) → Smiths — Listen, I like the Smiths, too, but Smiths should be a disambiguation page. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 22:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Survey
- Add # '''Support''' or # '''Oppose''' on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
Survey - Support votes
- Support as nominator, plus: Smiths Group is a major industrial concern, as is Smiths Aerospace, and the other usages are notable as well. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 22:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Anytime there are other major items that share a name, we should err on the side of disambiguation because there is no gurantee that the majority of user searching for the term are going to be looking for the band. I can easily see my teenage son or his friends being more likely to look for the brad pitt & angelina jolie characters in searching for "The Smiths" then the rock band. Not to mention the other valid search options that the nominator has mentioned. 205.157.110.11 00:23, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Clearly the grocery chain is the primary use for many. However given the number of significant uses, it is reasonable to have the dab page at the main names space. Vegaswikian 22:43, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support, too many common uses. PC78 22:17, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Survey - Oppose votes
Discussion
- Add any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.