Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swarmcast: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Swarmcast: d |
→Swarmcast: delete, don't think this passes the minimum necessary standards required |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Minnesota|list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 10:19, 3 June 2021 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Minnesota|list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 10:19, 3 June 2021 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete''' Uncontroversially fails [[WP:ORG]], no sourcing in article, no coverage in RS. Best [[User:Alexandermcnabb|Alexandermcnabb]] ([[User talk:Alexandermcnabb|talk]]) 12:29, 3 June 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Uncontroversially fails [[WP:ORG]], no sourcing in article, no coverage in RS. Best [[User:Alexandermcnabb|Alexandermcnabb]] ([[User talk:Alexandermcnabb|talk]]) 12:29, 3 June 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''I really did try to dig up independent, reliable sources on this one. But returned empty handed. I don't think this passes the minimum necessary standards required of a Wikipedia article, [[User:JeanPaulMontmartre|JeanPaulMontmartre]] ([[User talk:JeanPaulMontmartre|talk]]) 12:43, 3 June 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:43, 3 June 2021
Swarmcast
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Swarmcast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The company is/was not notable. Reliable sources are absent. It also fails to meet WP:N and WP:ORG. Sharky tale (talk) 10:18, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:19, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:19, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Uncontroversially fails WP:ORG, no sourcing in article, no coverage in RS. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:29, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- DeleteI really did try to dig up independent, reliable sources on this one. But returned empty handed. I don't think this passes the minimum necessary standards required of a Wikipedia article, JeanPaulMontmartre (talk) 12:43, 3 June 2021 (UTC)