Vital Sign Alert System: Difference between revisions
m Normalize {{Multiple issues}}: Remove {{Multiple issues}} for only 1 maintenance template(s): Technical |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Alter: template type. Add: doi, issue, volume, journal, s2cid, pmid. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:All articles that are too technical | #UCB_Category 2636/2865 |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{technical|date=October 2013}} |
{{technical|date=October 2013}} |
||
'''Vital Sign Alert System''' is an alert system designed by [[Nursing|nurses]] at [[Sentara Norfolk General Hospital]] in [[Norfolk, Virginia]]. The alert system, which replaced an ineffective early warning scoring (EWS) system, is a unique creation designed specifically to enhance patient monitoring on [[Medical-surgical nursing|medical–surgical]] and step-down nursing units without increasing the nurse's workload.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://journals.lww.com|title=LWW Journals|publisher=Lippincott Williams & Wilkins}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Jones|first=Barbara|year=2013|title=Developing a Vital Sign Alert System|journal=American Journal of Nursing|volume=113|issue=8|pages=36–44|doi=10.1097/01.naj.0000432962.33881.65}}</ref> |
'''Vital Sign Alert System''' is an alert system designed by [[Nursing|nurses]] at [[Sentara Norfolk General Hospital]] in [[Norfolk, Virginia]]. The alert system, which replaced an ineffective early warning scoring (EWS) system, is a unique creation designed specifically to enhance patient monitoring on [[Medical-surgical nursing|medical–surgical]] and step-down nursing units without increasing the nurse's workload.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://journals.lww.com|title=LWW Journals|publisher=Lippincott Williams & Wilkins}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Jones|first=Barbara|year=2013|title=Developing a Vital Sign Alert System|journal=American Journal of Nursing|volume=113|issue=8|pages=36–44|doi=10.1097/01.naj.0000432962.33881.65|pmid=23851288|s2cid=27294584}}</ref> |
||
== Process == |
== Process == |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Benefits == |
== Benefits == |
||
Theoretically, an EWS system facilitates early detection of life-threatening changes, giving the nurse time to confer with a physician and institute corrective measures to stabilize the patient's condition. Literature reviews conducted over the past decade, however, have found little evidence that EWS systems are effective in reducing [[Adverse effect|adverse events]].<ref>{{cite book|last=Esmonde|first=L|title=Investigating the effectiveness of critical care outreach services|year=2006|pages=1713–21}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Kyriacos|first=U|title=Monitoring vital signs using early warning scoring systems|year=2011|pages=311–30}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=McGaughey|first=J|title=Outreach and early warning systems for the prevention of intensive care admission and death of cristically ill adult patients on general hospital wards|year=2007}}</ref> Furthermore, there is little evidence that such instruments are reliable or valid.<ref>{{cite |
Theoretically, an EWS system facilitates early detection of life-threatening changes, giving the nurse time to confer with a physician and institute corrective measures to stabilize the patient's condition. Literature reviews conducted over the past decade, however, have found little evidence that EWS systems are effective in reducing [[Adverse effect|adverse events]].<ref>{{cite book|last=Esmonde|first=L|title=Investigating the effectiveness of critical care outreach services|year=2006|pages=1713–21}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Kyriacos|first=U|title=Monitoring vital signs using early warning scoring systems|year=2011|pages=311–30}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=McGaughey|first=J|title=Outreach and early warning systems for the prevention of intensive care admission and death of cristically ill adult patients on general hospital wards|year=2007}}</ref> Furthermore, there is little evidence that such instruments are reliable or valid.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Gao|first=H|title=Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward|journal=Intensive Care Medicine|year=2007|volume=33|issue=4|pages=667–79|doi=10.1007/s00134-007-0532-3|pmid=17318499|s2cid=785355}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Subbe|first=CP|title=Reproducibility of physiological track-and-trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward|journal=Intensive Care Medicine|year=2007|volume=33|issue=4|pages=619–24|doi=10.1007/s00134-006-0516-8|pmid=17235508|s2cid=21260595}}</ref> EWS systems have been criticized for being too labor-intensive and complex for practical use on medical–surgical units. It's been suggested that the increased nursing workload associated with such systems, as well as general misunderstandings concerning their use and the significance of patients’ scores, may explain the failure of nurses to use them correctly and consistently.<ref>{{cite book|last=Morris|first=A|title=Early warning scoring systems: observation of care in practice|year=2010|pages=1180–4}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Oakey|first=RJ|title=Physiological observation track and trigger system|journal=Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)|year=2006|volume=20|issue=27|pages=48–54|doi=10.7748/ns2006.03.20.27.48.c4094|pmid=16566339}}</ref> |
||
==References== |
==References== |
||
Revision as of 21:52, 3 June 2021
 | This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. (October 2013) |
Vital Sign Alert System is an alert system designed by nurses at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital in Norfolk, Virginia. The alert system, which replaced an ineffective early warning scoring (EWS) system, is a unique creation designed specifically to enhance patient monitoring on medical–surgical and step-down nursing units without increasing the nurse's workload.[1][2]
Process
Hospitalized patients often exhibit signs of deterioration several hours before experiencing cardiopulmonary arrest. These early warning signs frequently go unrecognized by nurses on medical–surgical units, who tend to have large caseloads.[3][4] Over the past several years, the use of a rapid response team and an early warning scoring (EWS) system has been proposed as a possible solution to the problem.
A rapid response team is a designated group of clinicians with intensive care expertise, who can quickly assemble at a patient's bedside to institute immediate diagnostic and treatment measures in accordance with hospital protocol. Unfortunately, rapid response teams tend to be activated only after a patient's condition has deteriorated and destabilized to the point that emergency transfer to an ICU is required.
EWS systems are based on the premise that a decline in a patient's condition can be detected early through the assessment of an aggregate set of critical physiologic variables. Whereas a single abnormality among these variables may not signal a need for intervention, a combination of two or more irregularities, occurring together, may alert the nurse to a potentially dangerous change in the patient's condition.
Benefits
Theoretically, an EWS system facilitates early detection of life-threatening changes, giving the nurse time to confer with a physician and institute corrective measures to stabilize the patient's condition. Literature reviews conducted over the past decade, however, have found little evidence that EWS systems are effective in reducing adverse events.[5][6][7] Furthermore, there is little evidence that such instruments are reliable or valid.[8][9] EWS systems have been criticized for being too labor-intensive and complex for practical use on medical–surgical units. It's been suggested that the increased nursing workload associated with such systems, as well as general misunderstandings concerning their use and the significance of patients’ scores, may explain the failure of nurses to use them correctly and consistently.[10][11]
References
- ^ "LWW Journals". Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
- ^ Jones, Barbara (2013). "Developing a Vital Sign Alert System". American Journal of Nursing. 113 (8): 36–44. doi:10.1097/01.naj.0000432962.33881.65. PMID 23851288. S2CID 27294584.
- ^ McArthur-Rouse, F (2001). Critical care outreach services ad early warning scoring systems. pp. 696–704.
- ^ "National Patient safety Agency. Recognising and responding appropriately to early signs of deterioration in hospitalised patients". London: National Health Service. Retrieved December 19, 2018.
- ^ Esmonde, L (2006). Investigating the effectiveness of critical care outreach services. pp. 1713–21.
- ^ Kyriacos, U (2011). Monitoring vital signs using early warning scoring systems. pp. 311–30.
- ^ McGaughey, J (2007). Outreach and early warning systems for the prevention of intensive care admission and death of cristically ill adult patients on general hospital wards.
- ^ Gao, H (2007). "Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward". Intensive Care Medicine. 33 (4): 667–79. doi:10.1007/s00134-007-0532-3. PMID 17318499. S2CID 785355.
- ^ Subbe, CP (2007). "Reproducibility of physiological track-and-trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward". Intensive Care Medicine. 33 (4): 619–24. doi:10.1007/s00134-006-0516-8. PMID 17235508. S2CID 21260595.
- ^ Morris, A (2010). Early warning scoring systems: observation of care in practice. pp. 1180–4.
- ^ Oakey, RJ (2006). "Physiological observation track and trigger system". Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987). 20 (27): 48–54. doi:10.7748/ns2006.03.20.27.48.c4094. PMID 16566339.