Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parsa Khaef: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
My friend, many sources have been mentioned and are still available, but I did not add them because it seemed to be enough. But if you think they are not enough, I will add.
My friend, many sources have been mentioned and are still available, but I did not add them because it seemed to be enough. But if you think they are not enough, I will add.
Because deleting this article is cruel despite all the sources
Because deleting this article is cruel despite all the sources








''' Keep '''

Put a little rigor aside because this article is too valid and deleting it may not be fair

Revision as of 12:51, 9 June 2021

Parsa Khaef (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable musical artist. fails WP:GNG. Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. GermanKity (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:46, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Keep


My friend, many sources have been mentioned and are still available, but I did not add them because it seemed to be enough. But if you think they are not enough, I will add. Because deleting this article is cruel despite all the sources





Keep

Put a little rigor aside because this article is too valid and deleting it may not be fair