Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parsa Khaef: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
My friend, many sources have been mentioned and are still available, but I did not add them because it seemed to be enough. But if you think they are not enough, I will add. |
My friend, many sources have been mentioned and are still available, but I did not add them because it seemed to be enough. But if you think they are not enough, I will add. |
||
Because deleting this article is cruel despite all the sources |
Because deleting this article is cruel despite all the sources |
||
''' Keep ''' |
|||
Put a little rigor aside because this article is too valid and deleting it may not be fair |
Revision as of 12:51, 9 June 2021
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Parsa Khaef (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable musical artist. fails WP:GNG. Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. GermanKity (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:46, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Keep
My friend, many sources have been mentioned and are still available, but I did not add them because it seemed to be enough. But if you think they are not enough, I will add.
Because deleting this article is cruel despite all the sources
Keep
Put a little rigor aside because this article is too valid and deleting it may not be fair