User talk:Jaimie Henry

You Cool

You're Cool man, Hypothetical High five please?

My Apologies

I seem to have left my account logged in, and in my absence, a few mindless fools seem to have made changes to the page I was currently editing. Is it possible that you can revert the page to the acceptable edits my acconut made? I will make sure not to leave my account logged in from now on! Someone is also continually editing my comment to you, please forgive whatever profanities appear.

Firebringervt 18:55, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

• That's not a problem. I've left a message on your talk page. I'll deal with this other sitaution. Jem 19:02, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your help! Just a note, the BFA page still hasnt reverted to my most recent legitimate changes, (I had a picture and a data table loaded as well)

For you :)

		Glen's Anti-Vandalism Barnstar!
		Glen is thrilled to award Jaimie Henry with this small token of appreciation and acknowledgement for exceptional performance in the art of troll extermination, cruft elimination and for ensuring Wikipedia is safe for public consumption... You are a legend, please keep up the great work!  Glen  10:55, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

User warnings have been updated

Heya, take a look at WP:UTM. Looks like the old warning templates are being deprecated. --Brad Beattie (talk) 20:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

I made a change

I didn't vandal that page!?!
Unless you sign your name with four tildes (~~~~) I can't see who you are and can't comment on the revert I made. Please accept my sincere apologies if you feel I made the revert in error, and feel free to discuss this further with me here. Jem 22:15, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

I was going to add a picture. I edited the page. I fail to see what you could possibly hold as evidence of vandalism.Tah5tah 22:20, 23 January 2007 (UTC)tah5tah

Warnings

Please make sure to add your signature when you leave a warning, and use subst: when you leave a warning. Example: use {{subst:uw-vandalism1}} instead of {{uw-vandalism1}} as without the subst: the template is forced to load every time the talk page is loaded. - Penwhale | Blast the Penwhale 12:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application

Dear Jaimie Henry,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that you only have 161 mainspace edits. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 15:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi!

Why did you revert my added link to the nice guy article? Did you even visit the site before you deleted my edit? It is a very interesting site with lots of discussion and articles on the subject. Please explain!! :(

Danielos2 18:11, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Dear Jam, regarding SURREALISM article to prevent edit war and gain resolution

Jam, thanks so much for contacting me on my discussion page. The subsection, SURREALIST ART and RESOURCES in the EXTERNAL LINKS has been on the article for months without any problem until the users, THEEVILPANDA and TEXTURE SAVANT have come along to cause mischief. Also look at the edit history on the article and that will help. SURREALISM NOW! www.surrealismnow.com is specifically a SURREALIST ART and RESOURCES website for students and researchers and general art lovers. I have no problem with the other edits, I think it only fair to keep this link and the other one, too.