User talk:Fan-1967: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:36, 27 January 2007

If I leave a message in your talk page, reply there. I'll keep it on my watchlist. If you leave a message here, I'll reply here. Fan-1967

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Previous Archives

17 February 2006 to 7 July 2006: User talk:Fan-1967/Archive1

8 July 2006 to 8 August 2006: User talk:Fan-1967/Archive2

8 August 2006 to 6 October 2006: User talk:Fan-1967/Archive3

6 October 2006 to 20 November 2006: User talk:Fan-1967/Archive4

20 November 2006 to 11 December 2006: User talk:Fan-1967/Archive5

11 December 2006 to 2 January 2007: User talk:Fan-1967/Archive6

2 January 2007 to 25 January 2007: User talk:Fan-1967/Archive7

New messages, at the bottom, below:

E-mail

Just to let you know, I e-mailed you. Making the RfA page right now. Nishkid 64 23:55, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, are you a male/female? I think I know, but I just need some confirmation :-P. Nishkid 64 23:57, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page has now been created. Would you mind if Steel359 (talk · contribs) also co-nommed the RfA? He was planning to nominate you, and he just missed out :-P. Nishkid 64 00:21, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with daniel chen

There is nothing wrong with me posting a ligitimate page on Daniel Chen. He is a state record holder in the state of Oregon. This is important, he is the fastest 11-12 year old swimmer to ever swim in Oregon. I do not believe that it is appropriate to say that this is not important, or to punish me for posting an article about him on Wikipedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sgtpepper2751 (talk • contribs) 23:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

And do we have articles on the fastest 12-year-old swimmer in any other state? Can you find any articles on any other 12-year-old record holders? Fan-1967 00:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dur85

As the heir to the heir he is still a notable character and as such is worthy of description on wikipedia.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dur85 (talk • contribs)

No, there's nothing there that meets the standards at Wikipedia:Notability (people). Has he been "the subject of multiple non-trivial reports" in major publications? Doesn't appear so. There's an article on the baronetcy that lists his name as heir to the heir presumptive, and his birth year. Since he's never done anything of note other than being born into that family, I can't see any reason to have a separate article on him. Fan-1967 05:24, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

go away

under wikipedias mission statement, i can post freely as long as it has reference to something. this has reference and i would appreciate if you would end this wonderful little power trip that you are having and get a life thanks alex —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lastalex (talk • contribs) 05:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

No, nowhere in Wikipedia's mission statement does it say that it's a place for a schoolkid to write about how he bet his roommate he could create a Wikipedia article. Fan-1967 05:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

tangerine

hey why did you revert tangerine usertalk: nate1028

Answered at User talk:Nate1028. Edit had pasted all sorts of Wikipedia editing messages into the article. Fan-1967 14:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

tangerine

ok i fixed it take a look now... [[userL nate1028

tangerine

thanks for the critism —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nate1028 (talk • contribs) 15:00, 26 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I Apologize

So I made a very poor decision and I am terribly sorry that I vandalized grunge music.

Under the circumstances, I had no choice.

Can you imagine the kind of pressure I was in with all my friends egging me on?

Keep this to yourself, but I don't like them all too much.

Maybe one of these days, we can live in a world without peer pressure.

Yet I doubt that day will come.

But a man can only dream.

After all, everyone changes over the course of their life.

Lately, I've noticed everyone just seems nicer.

Luckily my friends seem nicer too.

So long, good sir, and have a good day. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mrcrono (talk • contribs) 18:13, 26 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Fan-1967

what's tyhe harm in adding a little nonsense to temporary pages as long as i'm marking them?Sigelhobit 19:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is vandalism. Fan-1967 19:54, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism of vandalism is vandalism?adding db-nonsense to an article is vandalism, adding it to nonsense is not. adding sigelhobit-sigelhobit-..... to an article is vandalism, adding it to nonsense is...Sigelhobit 19:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you vandalize the article so badly the reviewing admin can't even tell what was there, you are interfering with the process, not helping it. Fan-1967 19:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Latest

And this is why I have your page on my watchlist. That and so I can quickly block users like the one who just threatened to sue you. -- Merope 21:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm real popular. The guy above (Mrcrono) was a little more clever than most, don't you think? Fan-1967 21:21, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Random Smiley

User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward2 Jerry lavoie 22:29, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

Well, first accept the nomination :-P. [1]. Then tell me and I'll transclude it or you can transclude it yourself, but let me know. I need to get vote #1. In all of my RfA noms, I end up getting vote #30 or something. :S Nishkid 64 22:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, good luck with this, I'm with you 100%! The Rambling Man 23:45, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If nothing else, it's certainly a humbling, learning experience. Fan-1967 23:58, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll go along with that. "How to feel bad about yourself 101" I think... The Rambling Man 00:00, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I knew this one would turn into a bun fight, but the opposes haven't changed my mind yet! Bubba hotep 00:05, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the criticisms are valid. Some I disagree with, but at least I can listen to them. Fan-1967 00:08, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And right that you should. However, I've "met" (on my Wiki-travels) some incivil people (inc admins) and for some reason, you don't strike me as one. Bubba hotep 00:11, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit on Arab strap (sexual device)

why did u delete my addition? if you did not notice i had stated that he was not well-known and the fact that the use of an arab strap is not worldwide. What is the point of wikipedia if people are not able to find every detal that they can possibly find. i know that is why i enjoy using wikipedia so much. because it has every little piece of information you could ever want, and even some of the things you don't even need to know.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Monkeyboy27364 (talk • contribs)

At the core of Wikipedia's principles is Verifiability. If we can't verify something to be true, we cannot include it. If you can find some citation to support your reference, by all means do so, but I cannot even find any verification that such a porn performer even exists. Without verification, we cannot include the material. Fan-1967 00:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 107: / Line 107: @@
 ::::And right that you should. However, I've "met" (on my Wiki-travels) some incivil people (inc admins) and for some reason, you don't strike me as one. [[User:Bubba hotep|Bubba]] [[User talk:Bubba hotep|hotep]] 00:11, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
+== Reverted edit on [[Arab strap (sexual device)]] ==
-why did u delete my addition? if you did not notice i had stated that he was not well-known and the fact that the use of an arab strap is not worldwide.  What is the point of wikipedia if people are not able to find every detal that they can possibly find.  i know that is why i enjoy using wikipedia so much.  because it has every little piece of information you could ever want, and even some of the things you don't even need to know.
+why did u delete my addition? if you did not notice i had stated that he was not well-known and the fact that the use of an arab strap is not worldwide.  What is the point of wikipedia if people are not able to find every detal that they can possibly find.  i know that is why i enjoy using wikipedia so much.  because it has every little piece of information you could ever want, and even some of the things you don't even need to know.{{unsigned|Monkeyboy27364}}
+:At the core of Wikipedia's principles is [[WP:V|Verifiability]]. If we can't verify something to be true, we cannot include it. If you can find some citation to support your reference, by all means do so, but I cannot even find any verification that such a porn performer even exists. Without verification, we cannot include the material. [[User:Fan-1967|Fan-1967]] 00:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)