User talk:Sgtpepper2751

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nick Gipe has been nominated for Speedy Deletion[edit]

==Nick gipe== A tag has been placed on Nick gipe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted under Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. If you can indicate how Nick gipe is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}}, and also put a note on Talk:Nick gipe saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions.Risker 07:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel chen[edit]

You have recently recreated or reposted material which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies at Daniel chen. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review.


Wikipedia is not myspace. Please do not create articles on yourself or your friends. Fan-1967 23:41, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's enough[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to create inappropriate pages such as Daniel chen, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fan-1967 23:50, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Despite repeated warnings, you recreated the Daniel chen article. You have now been blocked from editing. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:30, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sgtpepper2751 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The article Daniel Chen is perfectly legitimate. Daniel Chen is a state record holder in Oregon. He should be recognized becuase he is the fastest 12 year old swimmer to ever swim in the state of Oregon

Decline reason:

Please see WP:UNDEL and WP:NOTABILITY. -- Yamla 00:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.