Jump to content

User talk:Betinfo: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Betinfo (talk | contribs)
Line 74: Line 74:
== Who has access to this account? ==
== Who has access to this account? ==
In your comment on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Betan]] you make repeated references to "we" and "contributors" in connection with edits from this account. Just how many people have access to it? Are you aware each account on Wikipedia must be accessible by only one person? ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 20:52, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
In your comment on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Betan]] you make repeated references to "we" and "contributors" in connection with edits from this account. Just how many people have access to it? Are you aware each account on Wikipedia must be accessible by only one person? ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 20:52, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
This is where the COI (Conflict of Interest) lays. The contributor and the subject of the article are the same. This has been stated, documented and apologized for in the ''Wikipediaarticlesfordeletion/peterbetan''Italic text''''page comment and rebuttal section by Betinfo. In answer to your question, no, we did not know that articles can only be accessible to one person but... The article "Peter Betan" has always been accessed by only one person since its initial publishing 12 years ago hence, the COI (the subject and contributor are one in the same) So although we were not aware of the " the articles are accessible only by one person" guideline, we did not commit an infraction with regard to the guideline because the contributor and subject of the article are the same. This is where the COI (Conflict of Interest)lays Thank you -

Revision as of 20:26, 27 July 2021

Welcome!

Hello, Betinfo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! RP459 (talk) 16:43, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Hollywood Clambake 2006 - Robert Stolpe.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Hollywood Clambake 2006 - Robert Stolpe.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Hollywood Clambake 2006 - Robert Stolpe.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hollywood Clambake 2006 - Robert Stolpe.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Hollywood Clambake 2006 Robert Stolpe.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hollywood Clambake 2006 Robert Stolpe.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Betinfo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Information icon Hello, Betinfo. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:39, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peter Betan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Betan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Betan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

~Anachronist (talk) 21:19, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Who has access to this account?

In your comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Betan you make repeated references to "we" and "contributors" in connection with edits from this account. Just how many people have access to it? Are you aware each account on Wikipedia must be accessible by only one person? ~Anachronist (talk) 20:52, 26 July 2021 (UTC) This is where the COI (Conflict of Interest) lays. The contributor and the subject of the article are the same. This has been stated, documented and apologized for in the Wikipediaarticlesfordeletion/peterbetanItalic text'page comment and rebuttal section by Betinfo. In answer to your question, no, we did not know that articles can only be accessible to one person but... The article "Peter Betan" has always been accessed by only one person since its initial publishing 12 years ago hence, the COI (the subject and contributor are one in the same) So although we were not aware of the " the articles are accessible only by one person" guideline, we did not commit an infraction with regard to the guideline because the contributor and subject of the article are the same. This is where the COI (Conflict of Interest)lays Thank you -[reply]