Jump to content

User talk:Broccoli and Coffee: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted
Line 50: Line 50:
[[User:AshleyN R|AshleyN R]] ([[User talk:AshleyN R|talk]]) 19:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
[[User:AshleyN R|AshleyN R]] ([[User talk:AshleyN R|talk]]) 19:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)


==In Relation to adding a Sociomix link on the BoJack Horseman page==
==In Relation to adding a link on the BoJack Horseman page==


Hello Broccoli and Coffee, hope you are well. Don't you think that a write up on the outfits used in BoJack Horseman is a great idea and can be very useful for the audience giving an entirely new perspective? I just joined wikipedia yesterday and love the platform and I see that you are here since a very long time. Can you please guide me, what is the right way to get this link across? My idea here is to simply spread meaningful and useful content that the fans and community will find really useful. What do you suggest?
Hello Broccoli and Coffee, hope you are well. Don't you think that a write up on the outfits used in BoJack Horseman is a great idea and can be very useful for the audience giving an entirely new perspective? I just joined wikipedia yesterday and love the platform and I see that you are here since a very long time. Can you please guide me, what is the right way to get this link across? My idea here is to simply spread meaningful and useful content that the fans and community will find really useful. What do you suggest?
Line 57: Line 57:
:{{U|Varunrai11}} - first, just a reminder to log in to your account and to sign your posts with 4 tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) to make it clear who has posted.
:{{U|Varunrai11}} - first, just a reminder to log in to your account and to sign your posts with 4 tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) to make it clear who has posted.
: Second, it'd be helpful and a sign of good faith if you hadn't removed the message I left on your talk page about this issue.
: Second, it'd be helpful and a sign of good faith if you hadn't removed the message I left on your talk page about this issue.
: Third, the issue is less about "the outfits" in the show and more about what you call "meaningful and useful content". Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and the goal is to create unbiased, factual information. Including [[WP:LINKSPAM|link spam]], including in references, can be problematic. Wikipedia relies on [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], and Sociomix does not meet those standards. It also seems like you may have a relationship with the particular author of those posts, which makes it even more difficult to meet quality and reliability standards. You can read [[WP:COI]] for more info there. Asking {{tq|what is the right way to get this link across?}} suggests that your goal here is to get these links into the article, rather than include something meaningful for the page. I hope that helps clarify. – [[User:Broccoli and Coffee|<span style="color:#070">Broccoli</span> &#38; <span style="color: brown">Coffee</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Broccoli and Coffee|''Oh hai'']])</sup> 17:00, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
: Third, the issue is less about "the outfits" in the show and more about what you call "meaningful and useful content". Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and the goal is to create unbiased, factual information. Including [[WP:LINKSPAM|link spam]], including in references, can be problematic. Wikipedia relies on [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. It also seems like you may have a relationship with the particular author of those posts, which makes it even more difficult to meet quality and reliability standards. You can read [[WP:COI]] for more info there. Asking {{tq|what is the right way to get this link across?}} suggests that your goal here is to get these links into the article, rather than include something meaningful for the page. I hope that helps clarify. – [[User:Broccoli and Coffee|<span style="color:#070">Broccoli</span> &#38; <span style="color: brown">Coffee</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Broccoli and Coffee|''Oh hai'']])</sup> 17:00, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

---
{{U|Broccoli and Coffee}} - You are no one to claim who is reliable or unreliable without a base or solid proof. If this comment doesn't go away in the next 24 hours, then I will be forced to take legal action against you for demeaning a brand name and hampering its reputation and public image without valid reasoning.

Revision as of 19:01, 2 August 2021

Were/Is

Aside from the fact that if you were pretending they were still an active band, it would be are not is - what you are doing is just plain wrong. I suggest you try that edit on an article on say the Beatles or the Rolling Stones and see how long your incorrect edit stands. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:BAC5:7800:68BA:CA69:DAC0:2045 (talk)

In Relation to Speedy Deletion of Carey St

You stated on my talk page that Carey St did not have any sources or references which is wrong as it clearly available at the bottom of the article. You also stated that the page was written from the perspective of a fan. I followed the same format of other band articles on wikipedia so if what you're saying is true then there are quite a few 'fan-perspective' written articles. The page has nothing wrong with it that would cite a deletion.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halljo22 (talkcontribs)

STOP REVERTING MY EDITS

The text was provided for me by the subject of the article. The photos were my own so I own the copyright to them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim Chuma Melbourne (talkcontribs)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Broccoli and Coffee:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 2800 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.[reply]

Thank You For Your Edits

Hello,

Dropping by to say thank you for going over some of my edit requests last week that I submitted for Quibi shows on Wikipedia! It really helped improve the pages because now users are getting the right link to where they can watch the rebranded Quibi shows. If you'd like, there are still some Quibi pages that need updating, such as Reno 911!, Agua Donkeys, Royalties, The Fugitive, Gayme Show, and Punk'd! They all have links that need updating or don't have an official website link. It'd be great to see these get up-to-date to help everyone that wants to find the Quibi shows on their correct websites!

Cheers to the start of August! Thank you for your hard work. AshleyN R (talk) 19:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In Relation to adding a link on the BoJack Horseman page

Hello Broccoli and Coffee, hope you are well. Don't you think that a write up on the outfits used in BoJack Horseman is a great idea and can be very useful for the audience giving an entirely new perspective? I just joined wikipedia yesterday and love the platform and I see that you are here since a very long time. Can you please guide me, what is the right way to get this link across? My idea here is to simply spread meaningful and useful content that the fans and community will find really useful. What do you suggest?

Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:201:4000:211F:41A7:6C89:5457:EA8 (talk)

Varunrai11 - first, just a reminder to log in to your account and to sign your posts with 4 tildes (~~~~) to make it clear who has posted.
Second, it'd be helpful and a sign of good faith if you hadn't removed the message I left on your talk page about this issue.
Third, the issue is less about "the outfits" in the show and more about what you call "meaningful and useful content". Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and the goal is to create unbiased, factual information. Including link spam, including in references, can be problematic. Wikipedia relies on reliable sources. It also seems like you may have a relationship with the particular author of those posts, which makes it even more difficult to meet quality and reliability standards. You can read WP:COI for more info there. Asking what is the right way to get this link across? suggests that your goal here is to get these links into the article, rather than include something meaningful for the page. I hope that helps clarify. – Broccoli & Coffee (Oh hai) 17:00, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]