User talk:103.163.124.65

August 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Succession (TV series). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 18:38, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

@YoungForever: While I don't think Adam McKay has ever been a credited “screenwriter” on that project or perhaps slightly contravening WP:CRYSTAL, even announced to be one going forward, I do get your point. Even if it's very ludicrous to insist for citation when WP:TV articles, and that infobox in particular, tend to be mostly light on citation. Therefore, I do accept your discretionary muscle-flexing in straight contradiction to the norm since I would rather not care about this whole WikiProject, than be bullied into accepting unfairly-high standards for my own contributions on the very same WikiProject articles, vis-à-vis parallel contributions from fellow editors. Hopefully, I was expansive enough to not cause any miscommunication here.

P.S. Just to be clear, I think the prose in the you're repeatedly referring to is actually MOS:SMALLFONT instead of.. You know? So try to be more precise when dealing with either me, or anybody else whom you wish to treat like me going forward. Cool? —103.163.124.65 (talk) 19:05, 22 August 2021 (UTC) Edited 19:08, 22 August 2021 (UTC) Edited 2nd 19:12, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

FYI, MOS:SMALLFONT is in the same section of MOS:FONTSIZE. — YoungForever^(talk) 19:36, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

@YoungForever: Ohh.. I know. Still doesn't make both one-&-the-same, when it comes to precision. I hope it's clear enough now? —103.163.124.65 (talk) 19:54, 22 August 2021 (UTC) Edited 22:45, 22 August 2021 (UTC)