User talk:Doğu

Oil Kings (movie) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Oil Kings (movie), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:09, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

@Spiderone Thanks for your message, I just saw this feature :) I can improve my article on draft and then send it to review again. I'm going to propose that feature on tr:wiki too :) Vikipolimer* (talk) 15:26, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Nabis (company)

Hello, Vikipolimer. Thanks for your comments on my Talk page, and for your offer to continue the conversation. I responded on Nabis (company)'s talk page. I hope we can talk this out. FishAndChips36 (talk) 21:28, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi @FishAndChips36 I just saw your message, you can create your page again with meat article criteria. 𝗩𝗶𝗸𝗶𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿 ℣ 00:15, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, @Vikipolimer. The speedy deletion was declined by another editor. What is “meat article criteria”? I assume you mean “meet,” and the criteria you’re referring to is notability? If so, I have responded in detail on the Talk page, and I invite your feedback. Let’s talk specifics, shall we? I want to understand what specifically you find lacking. FishAndChips36 (talk) 03:11, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

@FishAndChips36 Look at the: WP:CSD 𝗩𝗶𝗸𝗶𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿 ℣ 03:13, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

@Vikipolimer Did you see my response on the Talk page for Nabis? FishAndChips36 (talk) 11:16, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

@FishAndChips36 It's up to the community to decide :) 𝗩𝗶𝗸𝗶𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿 ℣ 11:52, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Viraj Khanna

Hello Vikipolimer, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Viraj Khanna, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 10:21, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

 Thanks @WereSpielChequers I'll check it detailed :) 𝗩𝗶𝗸𝗶𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿 ℣ 10:24, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Check edits carefully before reverting

In your edit to Kunnamangalam Police station, you incorrectly reverted an edit that was removing a duplicate paragraph from the article. You then warned the editor for "removal of maintenance templates", which was inaccurate. Your efforts at reverting vandalism from articles are appreciated, but please take more care that your reverts are correct and that the warnings you give editors are accurate. I undid your revert and your warning. Cheers! Schazjmd (talk) 16:34, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, @Schazjmd. Thanks for your feedback. I'll be more careful about the revert actions. 𝗩𝗶𝗸𝗶𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿 ℣ 20:08, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Disruptive behaviour

I made an edit to an article. I carefully explained my reason in the edit summary. One minute later, you reverted the edit without bothering to explain why. And then, you had the gall to leave me a message accusing me of not explaining my edit properly. Was this incompetence, or deliberate trolling? Zqzkqzq (talk) 08:04, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Zqzkqzq, You removed a sourced part from the article. 𝗩𝗶𝗸𝗶𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿 ℣ 08:08, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

And? You felt that entitled you to revert without explanation, while falsely accusing me of not explaining my edit? Zqzkqzq (talk) 08:12, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

@Zqzkqzq Please check the WP:Vandalism page for further information. 𝗩𝗶𝗸𝗶𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿 ℣ 08:14, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

You had better not be accusing me of vandalism. I'll ask you again: why did you revert my edit without any explanation, one minute after I made it, and then falsely accuse me of not explaining my edit? Zqzkqzq (talk) 08:18, 26 August 2021 (UTC)