Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayantani Guhathakurta (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:32, 28 August 2021

Sayantani Guhathakurta

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Doesn't appear to pass WP:NACTOR which says, "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions". The actress has surely roles in multiple films/shows that might be notable or not but I do not find anything that's significant with this actress, of course, when we say "multiple". ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 14:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 14:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 14:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 14:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Also, kindly refer to Talk:Sayantani Guhathakurta to know how & why the AfD discussion call has been taken by the nominator. -Hatchens (talk) 15:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hatchens:, hey there, I have been following this discussion lately. I'd like to know your views on WP:NACTOR, (precisely what has been already quoted): Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions.

I'd want your clarification if having played main roles in 11 feature length commercial movies and 4 popular Television shows doesn't qualify as being "significant role". I understand that you have some valid arguments with the appreciative tone of the article (which can be fixed) but isn't deleteing this article pushing the ball too far? This article gas gone through multiple reviews from draft stage to mainspace, I'm sure the other reviewers who have reviewed this article were not "Paid". Then why should we delete a perfectly noteable and well cited article which exists not just in English but also in other languages?

Thank you

Innocentbunny TALK 02:31, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 *'''Delete''' as per nom. Also, kindly refer to [[Talk:Sayantani Guhathakurta]] to know how & why the AfD discussion call has been taken by the nominator. -[[User:Hatchens|Hatchens]] ([[User talk:Hatchens|talk]]) 15:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 ::{{ping|Hatchens}}, hey there, I have been following this discussion lately. I'd like to know your views on [[WP:NACTOR]], (precisely what has been already quoted): ''Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions''.
-I'd want your clarification if having played main roles in 11 feature length commercial movies and 4 popular Television shows doesn't qualify as being "significant role". I understand that you have some valid arguments with the appreciative tone of the article (which can be fixed) but isn't deleteing this article pushing the ball too far? This article gas gone through multiple reviews from draft stage to mainspace, I'm sure the other reviewers who have reviewed this article were not "Paid". Then why should we delete a perfectly noteable and well cited article which exists not just in English but also in other languages?
+::I'd want your clarification if having played main roles in 11 feature length commercial movies and 4 popular Television shows doesn't qualify as being "significant role". I understand that you have some valid arguments with the appreciative tone of the article (which can be fixed) but isn't deleteing this article pushing the ball too far? This article gas gone through multiple reviews from draft stage to mainspace, I'm sure the other reviewers who have reviewed this article were not "Paid". Then why should we delete a perfectly noteable and well cited article which exists not just in English but also in other languages?
 ::Thank you
 ::<small><font color="white" style="background:black"><b> &nbsp;Innocentbunny &nbsp;</b></font>[[User Talk:Innocentbunny|<font color="" style="background:white"> &nbsp;TALK&nbsp;</font>]]</small> 02:31, 28 August 2021 (UTC)