Talk:ScriptX: Difference between revisions
Sensorfire (talk | contribs) m typo |
→Split page?: response to Sensorfire |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Split page? == |
== Split page? == |
||
Considering this is a page about two different pieces of software, shouldn't it be two pages? For example, [[ScriptX (development environment)]] and [[ScriptX (Internet Explorer add-on)]].<br>--[[User:Sensorfire|<span style="color:green">ϟᴇɴsᴏʀ</span><span style="color:#f76504">ꜰɪʀᴇ</span>]] ([[User talk:Sensorfire|✎]]|[[Special:Contributions/Sensorfire|‽]]) 14:36, 1 October 2018 (UTC) |
Considering this is a page about two different pieces of software, shouldn't it be two pages? For example, [[ScriptX (development environment)]] and [[ScriptX (Internet Explorer add-on)]].<br>--[[User:Sensorfire|<span style="color:green">ϟᴇɴsᴏʀ</span><span style="color:#f76504">ꜰɪʀᴇ</span>]] ([[User talk:Sensorfire|✎]]|[[Special:Contributions/Sensorfire|‽]]) 14:36, 1 October 2018 (UTC) |
||
Just now seeing your suggestion, Sensorfire. Yes, splitting the article seems appropriate to me. It would've been nice for the content that I added (about the Internet Explorer add-on) to remain in the article to facilitate such a split. I'm getting tired of my contributions being reverted without good reason... hence my diminishing investment of time and effort on Wikipedia. -[[User:JohnAlbertRigali|JohnAlbertRigali]] ([[User talk:JohnAlbertRigali|talk]]) 18:26, 5 October 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:26, 5 October 2021
![]() | Computing Unassessed | |||||||||
|
I suggest a brief description here, and a link to a main article under Kaleida Labs. --Metzenberg 21:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Improper citation of source?
The first paragraph of this article seems to be copied directly from http://www.art.net/~hopkins/Don/lang/scriptx/drdobbs/drdobbs-1194b.html without proper citation. I do not know enough about the topic to correct the article, but this should be revised. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.89.166.166 (talk) 20:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Split page?
Considering this is a page about two different pieces of software, shouldn't it be two pages? For example, ScriptX (development environment) and ScriptX (Internet Explorer add-on).
--ϟᴇɴsᴏʀꜰɪʀᴇ (✎|‽) 14:36, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Just now seeing your suggestion, Sensorfire. Yes, splitting the article seems appropriate to me. It would've been nice for the content that I added (about the Internet Explorer add-on) to remain in the article to facilitate such a split. I'm getting tired of my contributions being reverted without good reason... hence my diminishing investment of time and effort on Wikipedia. -JohnAlbertRigali (talk) 18:26, 5 October 2021 (UTC)