Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiktor Kociuban: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
+comment |
Changing according to the tip |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* '''Not delete''' In my humble opinion the article should not be removed. The artist has collaborated with many legendary names, but what is more important, he has a significant contribution in performing the new music, he made many world prapremiers. I will add more sources and some content to prove it. [[User:Atomksk|Atomksk]] ([[User talk:Atomksk|talk]]) 19:50, 1 November 2021 (UTC) |
* '''Not delete''' In my humble opinion the article should not be removed. The artist has collaborated with many legendary names, but what is more important, he has a significant contribution in performing the new music, he made many world prapremiers. I will add more sources and some content to prove it. [[User:Atomksk|Atomksk]] ([[User talk:Atomksk|talk]]) 19:50, 1 November 2021 (UTC) |
||
* '''Delete'''. My search only yielded passing mentions and this [https://prestoportal.pl/wiktor-kociuban-staram-sie-wejsc-do-glowy-kompozytora interview] in a Polish art magazine. We're very far from [[WP:SIGCOV]], [[WP:NARTIST]] and [[WP:ANYBIO]]. [[User:Pilaz|Pilaz]] ([[User talk:Pilaz|talk]]) 23:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC) |
* '''Delete'''. My search only yielded passing mentions and this [https://prestoportal.pl/wiktor-kociuban-staram-sie-wejsc-do-glowy-kompozytora interview] in a Polish art magazine. We're very far from [[WP:SIGCOV]], [[WP:NARTIST]] and [[WP:ANYBIO]]. [[User:Pilaz|Pilaz]] ([[User talk:Pilaz|talk]]) 23:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC) |
||
* ''' |
* '''Comment''' The articles is improved, corrected and cmopleted with the sources, a lot of references, before sharing your opinion, please review the new currect, new version. [[User:Atomksk|Atomksk]] ([[User talk:Atomksk|talk]]) 22:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC) |
||
: '''Comment'''. {{Reply to|Atomksk}} The sources you added only give passing mentions to the author and don't talk about him, so they don't contribute to [[WP:GNG]]. In our jargon, they may even constitute a [[WP:REFBOMB]]. The subject should be covered in-depth, independently, by reliable secondary sources. Also, you can't vote twice, so please replace your "Not delete" with "Comment". Thank you. [[User:Pilaz|Pilaz]] ([[User talk:Pilaz|talk]]) 00:08, 4 November 2021 (UTC) |
: '''Comment'''. {{Reply to|Atomksk}} The sources you added only give passing mentions to the author and don't talk about him, so they don't contribute to [[WP:GNG]]. In our jargon, they may even constitute a [[WP:REFBOMB]]. The subject should be covered in-depth, independently, by reliable secondary sources. Also, you can't vote twice, so please replace your "Not delete" with "Comment". Thank you. [[User:Pilaz|Pilaz]] ([[User talk:Pilaz|talk]]) 00:08, 4 November 2021 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 00:49, 4 November 2021
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Wiktor Kociuban (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable to meet WP:NARTIST. Does not pass WP:ANYBIO, either. Htanaungg (talk) 03:37, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Htanaungg (talk) 03:37, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Htanaungg (talk) 03:37, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:45, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Not delete In my humble opinion the article should not be removed. The artist has collaborated with many legendary names, but what is more important, he has a significant contribution in performing the new music, he made many world prapremiers. I will add more sources and some content to prove it. Atomksk (talk) 19:50, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. My search only yielded passing mentions and this interview in a Polish art magazine. We're very far from WP:SIGCOV, WP:NARTIST and WP:ANYBIO. Pilaz (talk) 23:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The articles is improved, corrected and cmopleted with the sources, a lot of references, before sharing your opinion, please review the new currect, new version. Atomksk (talk) 22:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. @Atomksk: The sources you added only give passing mentions to the author and don't talk about him, so they don't contribute to WP:GNG. In our jargon, they may even constitute a WP:REFBOMB. The subject should be covered in-depth, independently, by reliable secondary sources. Also, you can't vote twice, so please replace your "Not delete" with "Comment". Thank you. Pilaz (talk) 00:08, 4 November 2021 (UTC)