Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiktor Kociuban: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Atomksk (talk | contribs)
Adding the comment
Atomksk (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
* '''Comment''' The articles is improved, corrected and cmopleted with the sources, a lot of references, before sharing your opinion, please review the new currect, new version. [[User:Atomksk|Atomksk]] ([[User talk:Atomksk|talk]]) 22:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
* '''Comment''' The articles is improved, corrected and cmopleted with the sources, a lot of references, before sharing your opinion, please review the new currect, new version. [[User:Atomksk|Atomksk]] ([[User talk:Atomksk|talk]]) 22:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
: '''Comment'''. {{Reply to|Atomksk}} The sources you added only give passing mentions to the author and don't talk about him, so they don't contribute to [[WP:GNG]]. In our jargon, they may even constitute a [[WP:REFBOMB]]. The subject should be covered in-depth, independently, by reliable secondary sources. Also, you can't vote twice, so please replace your "Not delete" with "Comment". Thank you. [[User:Pilaz|Pilaz]] ([[User talk:Pilaz|talk]]) 00:08, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
: '''Comment'''. {{Reply to|Atomksk}} The sources you added only give passing mentions to the author and don't talk about him, so they don't contribute to [[WP:GNG]]. In our jargon, they may even constitute a [[WP:REFBOMB]]. The subject should be covered in-depth, independently, by reliable secondary sources. Also, you can't vote twice, so please replace your "Not delete" with "Comment". Thank you. [[User:Pilaz|Pilaz]] ([[User talk:Pilaz|talk]]) 00:08, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
'''Comment'''. {{Reply to|Pilaz}} Thank you, I have changed to "Comment". But still I need a help how to improve it, since the sources I have added are independent and reliable[[User:Atomksk|Atomksk]] ([[User talk:Atomksk|talk]]) 00:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC).
* '''Comment'''. {{Reply to|Pilaz}} Thank you, I have changed to "Comment". But still I need a help how to improve it, since the sources I have added are independent and reliable[[User:Atomksk|Atomksk]] ([[User talk:Atomksk|talk]]) 00:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC).

Revision as of 00:54, 4 November 2021

Wiktor Kociuban (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable to meet WP:NARTIST. Does not pass WP:ANYBIO, either. Htanaungg (talk) 03:37, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. @Atomksk: The sources you added only give passing mentions to the author and don't talk about him, so they don't contribute to WP:GNG. In our jargon, they may even constitute a WP:REFBOMB. The subject should be covered in-depth, independently, by reliable secondary sources. Also, you can't vote twice, so please replace your "Not delete" with "Comment". Thank you. Pilaz (talk) 00:08, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]