Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VeryGoodBoy

VeryGoodBoy

VeryGoodBoy (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VeryGoodBoy/Archive.

27 November 2021

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

• SsSsSs0909 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Ghuaadg441 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 112.172.112.143 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 117.198.119.16 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 117.198.120.240 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

• Tools: [https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py?users=VeryGoodBoy&users=SsSsSs0909&users=Ghuaadg441&users=117.198.119.16&users=

117.198.120.240 Editor interaction utility] • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User SsSsSs0909 has similar edit interests associated with East Asians and genetic studies about East Asians. A tendency to support a "northern route origin" for East Asians and Northeast Asian supremacist agenda (specifically Korean nationalist agendas). Typical behavior seems to be dismissing any link between Northeast Asians and Southeast Asians as well as rejecting any ancestral link or southern origin for East Asians (such as the mainstream model of a southern coastal dispersal for East-Eurasians). Prolific edits on the English Wikipedia and Wikimedia, as well as cross-wiki edits linked to Wikimedia files. Specifically compare SsSsSs0909 and Ghuaadg441. Also note the style of naming their sock accounts. Another suspicious link is found to user Bookworm0808.

Also specifically look to the cross-wiki vandalism and POV by Ghuaadg441:. Here the same pattern as Ghuaadg441, cross-wiki edits, specifically related to East Asians and haplogroups:.

The user SsSsSs0909 also seems to be very knowledgeable about another sock user known as “WorldCreaterFighter", which seems suspicious for a new user. It is very unlikely that a new user comes instantly in an edit war and accuses others to be sock puppets. Furthermore, unconstructive edits, deleting large amounts of sourced content and replacing it with sentences copy pasted from an older 2011 study, which more fits his agenda, as well as misleading edit summaries, is not a constructive contribution to Wikipedia. For more information about this problem, see:.ToRespond (talk) 06:55, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

References

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Is it a Northeast asian supremacist to contribute the hypotheses that the Northern and Southern routes met to form East Asians on the article?[1][2] This filer is claiming that only the southern route is true without providing any source to deny the northern route.[3][4][5] Did I claim that the southern-origin model was wrong and only the northern route was correct? No. Did I remove the southern-origin model? No. The reason I know WorldCreaterFighter well is that I reported copyright violation files uploaded by that user's sock.[6][7][8] And WorldCreaterFighter is an LTA with a project page.[9]--SsSsSs0909 (talk) 14:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
  • That is sadly a balant lie. I have explicitly explained why your edits are problematic and unconstructive, see:. There I even included an inline citation, but you completely ignored it and again deleted the whole content and replaced it with WP:OR, you only left the previous references, but the content itself got completely deformed. How do you explain the results by the quoted study? You can not simply take a 2011 paper which talks about several possibilities and replaced a 2021 paper which cites explicit evidence ans reasoning. That is a violation of WP:Weight and WP:POV, furthermore WP:RS.ToRespond (talk) 17:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Furthermore, you say you reported copyright violations, but there are no reports made by your account at the linked page:[10]. So either you are lying, or you did hereby say that you were using another account. Additionally, the files you reported in these two links:[11][12], were uploaded by an user not blocked as sockpuppet of WorldCreaterFighter, so I ask you again how you can know all that? Hey, we both know that you are not honest, and that you try hard to separate Northeast Asians and Southeast Asians. Not only here, I have found similar patterns on other forums by an individual. Do you realize that the 2011 study even concluded that the major ancestry of East/Southeast Asians comes from the southern route, but that a northern route population may have had some influence too? And we already know all that. Paleo-Siberians have considerable ANE ancestry. But I do not have to discuss that here, you are exposed.ToRespond (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

---