User talk:Evann31: Difference between revisions
Notifying about suspicion of sockpuppeteering. |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|[[File:Puppeter template.svg|40px|center|link=|alt=]] |
|[[File:Puppeter template.svg|40px|center|link=|alt=]] |
||
}} [[User:Chess|Chess]] ([[User talk:Chess|talk]]) <small>(please use {{tlx|reply to|Chess}} on reply)</small><!--Template:Please ping--> 00:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC) |
}} [[User:Chess|Chess]] ([[User talk:Chess|talk]]) <small>(please use {{tlx|reply to|Chess}} on reply)</small><!--Template:Please ping--> 00:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC) |
||
There is absolutely no evidence for this claim, I have seen the multiple attempts to censor this party on flimsy evidence and have responded to the ridiculous attempt. The lack of evidence, and the repeated nature of the calls for deletion which are the source for my comments which "verbatim" to the other account (which is itself incorrect) should be enough to dismiss this investigation out of hand. Just as the calls for deletion are politically-motivated and groundless, so too is this investigation. [[User:Evann31|Evann31]] ([[User talk:Evann31#top|talk]]) 19:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:56, 16 December 2021
Sockpuppet investigation
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Unrequestedsillything, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}}
on reply) 00:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
There is absolutely no evidence for this claim, I have seen the multiple attempts to censor this party on flimsy evidence and have responded to the ridiculous attempt. The lack of evidence, and the repeated nature of the calls for deletion which are the source for my comments which "verbatim" to the other account (which is itself incorrect) should be enough to dismiss this investigation out of hand. Just as the calls for deletion are politically-motivated and groundless, so too is this investigation. Evann31 (talk) 19:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC)