User talk:Sulla16: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Eton: Not vandalism
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


In your edit on [[Eton College]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eton_College&diff=56236272&oldid=56208829], you reintroduced references to Harrow and Winchester that had been removed several times as unsourced. The topic was also discussed on the [[Talk:Eton College|talk page]]. Thus, the removal of the Harrow and Winchester text can hardly be called "vandalism". Yours, [[User:Huon|Huon]] 10:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
In your edit on [[Eton College]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eton_College&diff=56236272&oldid=56208829], you reintroduced references to Harrow and Winchester that had been removed several times as unsourced. The topic was also discussed on the [[Talk:Eton College|talk page]]. Thus, the removal of the Harrow and Winchester text can hardly be called "vandalism". Yours, [[User:Huon|Huon]] 10:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

==[[Sulla]]==
Saying history showed Sulla to have been wiser than Caesar because he died in bed while Caesar died knifed is an opinion or a comment; it's a conclusion reached subjectively. Do I agree with it? I don't know since I can't say I've researched the topic enough.

Anyway the information on Sulla in that short sentence is elsewhere in the article, while the information on how Caesar died belongs in the Caesar article so is not required here. [[User:Vfp15|Vincent]] 06:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:49, 9 February 2007

In your edit on Eton College [1], you reintroduced references to Harrow and Winchester that had been removed several times as unsourced. The topic was also discussed on the talk page. Thus, the removal of the Harrow and Winchester text can hardly be called "vandalism". Yours, Huon 10:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saying history showed Sulla to have been wiser than Caesar because he died in bed while Caesar died knifed is an opinion or a comment; it's a conclusion reached subjectively. Do I agree with it? I don't know since I can't say I've researched the topic enough.

Anyway the information on Sulla in that short sentence is elsewhere in the article, while the information on how Caesar died belongs in the Caesar article so is not required here. Vincent 06:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]