Jump to content

Talk:Aerial image: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 192.0.12.240 - "needs work!"
Line 2: Line 2:


Yikes, this is true in such a domain specific way as to be mostly wrong. Google eyepiece aerial image. Maybe just a pointer to Virtual Image, which seems to be the popular term these days, but for the 19th and 20th centuries, the term aerial image was the term for the image floating in space that another optical system focus on. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/192.0.12.240|192.0.12.240]] ([[User talk:192.0.12.240#top|talk]]) 18:51, 21 April 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Yikes, this is true in such a domain specific way as to be mostly wrong. Google eyepiece aerial image. Maybe just a pointer to Virtual Image, which seems to be the popular term these days, but for the 19th and 20th centuries, the term aerial image was the term for the image floating in space that another optical system focus on. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/192.0.12.240|192.0.12.240]] ([[User talk:192.0.12.240#top|talk]]) 18:51, 21 April 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Editing Disclaimer regarding subject knowledge ==

Hi, coincidentally I came across this stub when searching for optically formed 'aerial images'. My search was related to how some 'start-up' companies are now offering - or in the process of developing - generic 'digital backs' for film cameras using mobile phones. These are offered at much lower prices than more expensive 'digital backs' that allow film cameras to (temporarily) be fitted with a digital sensor.

I have no personal affiliation with any company or product in this field and no specialist knowledge in optics.

My aim in editing this page is primarily to include some references to 'optical' aerial images that I came across. I'm grateful to another member of photo.net for introducing me to the principle of 'aerial images' and explaikng how these are used in 'digital backs' that are based on mobile phones.

[[User:Mikemorrell49|Mikemorrell49]] ([[User talk:Mikemorrell49|talk]]) 11:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:38, 30 January 2022

WikiProject iconFilm: Filmmaking Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.

Yikes, this is true in such a domain specific way as to be mostly wrong. Google eyepiece aerial image. Maybe just a pointer to Virtual Image, which seems to be the popular term these days, but for the 19th and 20th centuries, the term aerial image was the term for the image floating in space that another optical system focus on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.0.12.240 (talk) 18:51, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Disclaimer regarding subject knowledge

Hi, coincidentally I came across this stub when searching for optically formed 'aerial images'. My search was related to how some 'start-up' companies are now offering - or in the process of developing - generic 'digital backs' for film cameras using mobile phones. These are offered at much lower prices than more expensive 'digital backs' that allow film cameras to (temporarily) be fitted with a digital sensor.

I have no personal affiliation with any company or product in this field and no specialist knowledge in optics.

My aim in editing this page is primarily to include some references to 'optical' aerial images that I came across. I'm grateful to another member of photo.net for introducing me to the principle of 'aerial images' and explaikng how these are used in 'digital backs' that are based on mobile phones.

Mikemorrell49 (talk) 11:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]