User talk:Kurykh: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:58, 10 February 2007

Welcome!

Hello, physicq210, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Bachrach44 01:10, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All over the place

I seem to be running into you all over the place! Thanks for the quick intervention at Stephen Colbert and all the tireless work you do here, and good luck on exams that end the 24th (my birthday!). Cheers! /Blaxthos 21:35, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

... for closing that interminable thread on WP:AN/I. Good luck with exams. MastCell 22:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions?

Do you have any suggestions as to what can be done about blatant vandals who blank their talk pages to hide their warnings? Katalaveno^T_C 03:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry ... ?

Just FYI, I was referring to policy WP:BLOCK (not "blockquote", seriously). However, is there any reason you don't suspect sockpuppetry going on? I seem to be seeing Telltale Sign Number One of socks, being that as soon as a user is blocked, not one, but two, users come to the blocked's defense, saying, "yeah, the block was in error and let's admit it". What do you think? Yuser31415 07:14, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for January 22nd, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 4	22 January 2007	About the Signpost

Wikipedia modifies handling of "nofollow" tag	WikiWorld comic: "Truthiness"
News and notes: Talk page template, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:41, 23 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Why me? Why solely me?

In response to your comment about the ongoing 3RR war with that other member. Yes, I understand the frustration and I do want it to end as much as you...but I do NOT see how you can pin the blame SOLELY on me. He is just as much to blame as I am, but you never female-dog him. Only me. I don't find that fair. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CBFan (talk • contribs) 17:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Thanks for putting my edit onto the main page, as soon as I did it I realised what I had done. It showed up that the last edit to the page was from me on my watchlist, but when I tried to revert it in the page history, my edit didn't show up - god damn servers! thanks again RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 00:03, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AIV and ParalelUni

I would not call another user "despicable" lightly, and I had a specific reason for saying what I said to a likely sock of that user. Please see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/St Christopher#ParalelUni_is_uncivil and Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/St Christopher/Evidence. There was a wide consensus in that case that this user's conduct may have been the worst in the history of Wikipedia. Newyorkbrad 02:00, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So because a user acted badly makes it okay for admin to discuss them in an uncivil way particularly when they can't respond? That hardly seems appropriate. Bad form. 67.177.149.119 02:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Physicq210, please check your e-mail in a few minutes. Thanks. Newyorkbrad 02:31, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AWB

Yes, please. I like your template a lot better, too.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 5	29 January 2007	About the Signpost

Foundation names advisory board, new hires	Court decisions citing Wikipedia proliferate
Microsoft approach to improving articles opens can of worms	WikiWorld comic: "Hyperthymesia"
News and notes: Investigation board deprecated, milestones	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 18:24, 30 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

HELP!!!!

Okay, I don't want to sound like I think you have nothing better to do, but you obviously know something about wikimarkup. I need help with my user page and am at my wits end of how to fix it. I know some HTML, but I can't figure out how to make it work on wikipedia. PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!!!J.delanoy 23:41, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Do you want to "chat" on your discussion page or mine?J.delanoy 23:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

		The Original Barnstar
		For blocking vandals on AIV, your thousands of great edits, and your continuing dedication to the project, I award you this Original Barnstar in all of its classic glory. Je via sano! Cheers, Dar-Ape 20:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite welcome! Dar-Ape 00:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for February 5th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 6	5 February 2007	About the Signpost

Foundation organizational changes enacted	Group of arbitrators makes public statement about IRC
AstroTurf PR firm discovered astroturfing	WikiWorld comic: "Clabbers"
News and notes: More legal citations, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

3RR

Dear Phyicq,

thanks for unblocking me .... it was a very genuine mistake - I assumed that if I were following the guidelines for NPOV then with a { { POV } } tag that the other parties would take it seriously and follow the procedure - I also thought that administrators would not only rebuke those who were removing the { { POV } } tag, but congratulate me (or at worst explain where I was going wrong with the procedure). The last thought on my mind was that I would be reprimanded when I was constantly explaining my actions - and I honestly didn't remember the 3RR (but in retrospect, it does ring a bell ... but not a big one!

Worst still, I now have three reputable articles all of which give credence to a number of experts holding a view that is contrary to that in the article. What do I do? Ignore the fact the article is POV?

But, I can't blame you for doing the right thing in this case - and there must be so many other disputes so I'm not asking for special treatment .... but a genuine thanks! Mike 11:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please chime in if you have any thoughts

There's an interesting experience going on over at WikiProject California, and WikiProject Southern California.

Some time ago, WikiProject California members had placed their project tags on all articles about California cities. Those tags have been in place for some time. Recently certain members of WikiProject Southern California, after discussion on that project's talk page (only), decided to remove the WikiProject California tags for (almost all) Southern California cities, and replace the tags with WikiProject Southern California tags - only.

That is, the WikiProject Southern California members didn't simply add the WikiProject Southern California tag to Southern California cities, the WikiProject California tags were completely removed. This was done apparently without consultation with the WikiProject California members.

We are gathering responses to the following questions on those projects' talk pages:

Do you have a view whether the WikiProject California tag should be removed from a large number of cities in Southern California?

Do you have a view whether city article for Southern California cities should have more than one WikiProject tag?

Please let us know if you have a view! Spamreporter1 16:14, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday !

Happy Birthday, Kurykh, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Whatever you wish for on your special day, May each of your wishes come true

Cheers! Pea ceNT 01:30, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Birthday Committee wishes you a very happy birthday! Enjoy your special day.

Happy Birthday on behalf of WP:BDC. Have a nice day! --Extranet ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 01:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:61.230.75.183.

@@ Line 238: / Line 238: @@
 |}
 ::Happy Birthday on behalf of [[WP:BDC]]. Have a nice day! --'''[[User:Extranet|Extranet]]''' <sup>([[User_talk:Extranet|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Extranet|Contribs]])</sup> 01:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
+{{test4|User talk:61.230.75.183}}