Template talk:Extra-parliamentary: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Survey: +cmt |
→Survey: Reply |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*(invited by the bot) ?? They look the same. <b style="color: #0000cc;">''North8000''</b> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 18:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC) |
*(invited by the bot) ?? They look the same. <b style="color: #0000cc;">''North8000''</b> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 18:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC) |
||
*[[WP:CONLEVEL]] A tiny RFC on this specific template is unlikely to undo any existing consensus by the larger community on templates as a whole.[[User:Serialjoepsycho|-Serialjoepsycho-]] ([[User talk:Serialjoepsycho|talk]]) 18:26, 2 March 2022 (UTC) |
*[[WP:CONLEVEL]] A tiny RFC on this specific template is unlikely to undo any existing consensus by the larger community on templates as a whole.[[User:Serialjoepsycho|-Serialjoepsycho-]] ([[User talk:Serialjoepsycho|talk]]) 18:26, 2 March 2022 (UTC) |
||
*:'''#F99''' as per reasons above, although I also think that this RfC is slightly trivial and unnecessary (unless there was unresolved discussion in the talk page that I'm missing) [[User:Ayvind-Bjarnason|<span style="color: #1e90ff">''' ¡Ay'''</span><span style="color: #005c62">'''vi'''</span><span style="color: #2ebeb0">'''nd'''</span><span style="color: #91008d">'''!'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ayvind-Bjarnason|''(talk)'']] 04:00, 3 March 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:00, 3 March 2022
RfC on the colour of Template:Extra-parliamentary
|
should the colour of Template:Extra-parliamentary be the current lighter #FFA4A4 or the original darker #99? Gooduserdude (talk) 16:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
#FFA4A4 #F99
Survey
- #F99, clearer, looks better for the purpose in election result tables and is not meant to be used with blue links so it complies with accessibility guidelines Gooduserdude (talk) 16:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- #F99 I prefer this darker shade P1221 (talk) 17:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- A very very tiny difference when viewed on a different PC. The lighter one is slightly better. North8000 (talk) 21:32, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- (invited by the bot) ?? They look the same. North8000 (talk) 18:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- WP:CONLEVEL A tiny RFC on this specific template is unlikely to undo any existing consensus by the larger community on templates as a whole.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 18:26, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- #F99 as per reasons above, although I also think that this RfC is slightly trivial and unnecessary (unless there was unresolved discussion in the talk page that I'm missing) ¡Ayvind! (talk) 04:00, 3 March 2022 (UTC)