User talk:Volten001

Your messages

I am editing on this Wiki since 2004 and I know what I am doing in accordance with our guidelines. Best regards though! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:A61:1084:4901:4818:4160:6032:F2FE (talk) 13:46, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

2001:A61:1084:4901:4818:4160:6032:F2FE,

Okay. If you do, you might understand some major changes require a general consensus and/or citations, right? Volten001 ^talk 13:52, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Shit, that sounds like a voice I try to avoid using, and I thot far less than a week had elapsed, but at age 75yrs 6mos 14 days, I’ve no confidence in my memory, nor in the consistency of my manners and ethics. Yes, right; and I admit to some recklessness, and to at best questionable judgement. —173.162.211.85 (talk) 173.162.211.85 (talk) 13:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Enlighten me a little bit please.... What are you talking about exactly in your message? Volten001 ^talk 13:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Oh, and also to relief that *at the least* my current ip-address has shifted, and

that my English is usually a bit more formal and gentle than that of the 

“ …2001:A61:1084:4901:4818:4160:6032:F2FE (talk) 13:46, 9 March 2022 (UTC)” msg above (still on @ least my screen). — 173.162.211.85 (talk) 13:57, 16 March 2022 (UTC) 173.162.211.85 (talk) 13:57, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Oh okay. So both IP addresses belong to you? I now get your point. Your English is much understable but you ruined it with the use of explicit language at the beginning. Anyway, my opinion is that as long as we are collectively trying to improve Wikipedia, and not vandalising it, that is all that matters. Volten001 ^talk 14:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Nah, nearly completely wrong. At 75 1/2 yrs, i am a little daft, but I was virtually certain that there was no possibility that the 1st batch of URLs above were due to me. They are probably a reflection of a “half-acid” internet scheme (cf. W’m Gibson’s ‘60s play 173.162.211.85 (talk) 15:34, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

…. ‘’Two for the See-Saw’’ (a ‘60s “rom-com” for stage), playing on a “half-assed diagnosis” that blamed, IIRC, the character’s stomach ulcers partly on stomach acidity, and partly on (*I* would guess) nervous stress. (If “half-assed”  seems confusing, consider how poorly a person would move around, if the muscles in one half of his/her buttocks had been  amputated … 

By the way, I don’t recall ever experiencing this com-interface before (tho it reminds me of teletype dialogues in the mid-1960s!). (Pausing to await any response, or complaint)

Oh! Your English is far better than the results of my 4 years of German, and if you’d value coaching on this crazy accident of history, freely given or for barter, don’t hesitate to discuss that.

173.162.211.85 (talk) 16:18, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

help

Hi thx for your message do u see the Moselle Open with blue background on this link ? https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=moselle+open&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 I want to remove it and see the new one , already downloaded on the wikipedia page how to do it please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steph55337 (talk • contribs) 13:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Unfortunately I don't know how to undo that. Type this {{help}} on your talk page and the same question. Someone will come to assist you Volten001 ^talk 13:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

IP sock edits

Hello Volten001, I have reverted all the recent edits at Genetic studies on Arabs back to the version of https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genetic_studies_on_Arabs&oldid=1074626121 per WP:BANREVERT of the LTA IP sock: (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/WorldCreaterFighter). I will later check if there are any reliable papers, for now I try to find and revert their misleading edits.

I hope this is OK for you too. Any help reverting the mass edits is appropriate! Best regards.Whhu22 (talk) 11:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Alright. It's very fine with me. Thanks a lot for doing a better job at combating vandalism. Volten001 ^talk 12:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Helping COI editors write advertisements

Can you explain why you made a full revert of my edit on Ruben Vardanyan (businessman) after I carefully removed brazen COI garbage that made the page look like an advertisement for the subject?[1] Is this something I should expect in the future? That editors such as yourself are going to nullify the laborious and time-consuming efforts to fix COI rubbish on this website? Should I just not bother? Snooganssnoogans (talk) 13:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

My apologies for that. And I accept that I made a mistake. However, be kind in notifying others. You don't have to use harsh words in sharing your views and opinions. Last but not least, try to write better edit summaries when making the edits (especially a critical one like removing/adding content). Thanks and I will revert my edit on that article. Happy editing Volten001 ^talk 14:00, 16 March 2022 (UTC)