Talk:365-day calendar: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:28, 24 March 2022

Time Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment

Stub status, high importance. I expected to see information regarding the history and formation of the 365-day calendar as well as methods of coping with the 365.25 problem 98.77.109.190 (talk) 03:55, 7 September 2009 (UTC) usemasper[reply]

Actually after review of other articles this article isn't really needed. 98.77.109.190 (talk) 04:02, 7 September 2009 (UTC) usemasper[reply]

Revision as of 04:02, 7 September 2009 edit 98.77.109.190 (talk) →‎Assessment= ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:28, 24 March 2022 edit undo 184.57.147.234 (talk) Agree with other IP from 2009 that this is more of a low priority for the WP. The more important parts of the article subject is covered by Gregorian, Julian articles and the calendar article overall. Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WikiProject Time\|class=Stub\|importance=~~High~~}}		{{WikiProject Time\|class=Stub\|importance=Low}}

	==Assessment==		==Assessment==