Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adewale Adetona (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Newliving (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Newliving (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Businesspeople|Businesspeople]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Finance|Finance]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Technology|Technology]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Nigeria|Nigeria]]. '''[[User talk:Princess of Ara|<span style="color:#f06292">Princess of Ara</span>]]''' 04:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)</small>
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Businesspeople|Businesspeople]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Finance|Finance]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Technology|Technology]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Nigeria|Nigeria]]. '''[[User talk:Princess of Ara|<span style="color:#f06292">Princess of Ara</span>]]''' 04:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)</small>


:: Hi {{re|Princess of Ara}} I believe that this page should not be deleted because it has significant coverage that satisfies [[WP:GNG]]. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to work on the article as extensively as I'd like to; to prove it's qualification. I'd be glad if allowed more time to work on it and if the article is left to remain on the main wiki space for as long as it's being improved (and with a new tag that governs this new stance). The article is less than 24 hours old and as we know "many good articles start their Wiki life in pretty bad shape. I believe a message outlining some improvements or a [[WP:TC]] tag is much more appropriate than a rushed deletion proposal. Please let me know if there are any specific guidelines that you'd like to see me improve upon in the upcoming days. Thank you for your help. Regards. [[User:Newliving|Newliving]] ([[User talk:Newliving|talk]]) 06:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
:: Hi {{re|Princess of Ara}} I believe that this page should not be deleted because it has significant coverage that satisfies [[WP:GNG]]. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to work on the article as extensively as I'd like to; to prove it's qualification. I'd be glad if allowed more time to work on it and if the article is left to remain on the main wiki space for as long as it's being improved (and with a new tag that governs this new stance). The article is less than 24 hours old and as we know "many good articles start their Wiki life in pretty bad shape. I believe a message outlining some improvements or a [[WP:TC]] tag is much more appropriate than a deletion proposal. Please let me know if there are any specific guidelines that you'd like to see me improve upon in the upcoming days. Thank you for your help. Regards. [[User:Newliving|Newliving]] ([[User talk:Newliving|talk]]) 06:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

::: I've added 7 additional references to this article. {{re|Princess of Ara}} Take a look at your earliest convenience. Regards. [[User:Newliving|Newliving]] ([[User talk:Newliving|talk]]) 10:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:41, 11 May 2022

Adewale Adetona

Adewale Adetona (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet WP:GNG. Sourced to sponsored posts. Princess of Ara 04:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Princess of Ara: I believe that this page should not be deleted because it has significant coverage that satisfies WP:GNG. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to work on the article as extensively as I'd like to; to prove it's qualification. I'd be glad if allowed more time to work on it and if the article is left to remain on the main wiki space for as long as it's being improved (and with a new tag that governs this new stance). The article is less than 24 hours old and as we know "many good articles start their Wiki life in pretty bad shape. I believe a message outlining some improvements or a WP:TC tag is much more appropriate than a deletion proposal. Please let me know if there are any specific guidelines that you'd like to see me improve upon in the upcoming days. Thank you for your help. Regards. Newliving (talk) 06:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've added 7 additional references to this article. @Princess of Ara: Take a look at your earliest convenience. Regards. Newliving (talk) 10:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]