User talk:Engineer-005

May 2022

Hello, I'm Acroterion. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Acroterion (talk) 00:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello. I wrote a lengthy explanation and blog post on the talk page, actually. Happy to discuss at length. Engineer-005 (talk) 18:27, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Engineer-005! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Doug Mastriano that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 19:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Tartan357. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Russ Diamond seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 19:08, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

I made that edit months ago haha. I see you have a left leaning bias and want to remove anything that makes articles neutral. Engineer-005 (talk) 21:37, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

It seems like everybody you disagree with is "left leaning" or "far left." Please stop making such judgments about other editors and about article subjects. This is becoming disruptive. Acroterion (talk) 22:53, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

All the power to you. Your bias is clear. Engineer-005 (talk) 01:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Acroterion (talk) 02:00, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your bias gets clearer by every post. Sorry if that makes you feel attacked :( Engineer-005 (talk) 23:12, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

I was referring to your swipe at Tartan357. Stop taking potshots at other editors. Acroterion (talk) 23:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

It's not a "swipe" or "attack" to call someone on their bias. You guys can gang up on me all day, I don't care. Wikipedia is all you have. Good for you both. Keyboard warriors through and through. Engineer-005 (talk) 02:14, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Acroterion (talk) 00:56, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

May 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —C.Fred (talk) 14:53, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Why am I blocked? Because I disagreed with 2 senior Wikipedia thought police editors about the subjective nature of the term "far right"? Engineer-005 (talk) 01:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your actions have demonstrated that you are unwilling or unable to follow Wikipedia guidance on sourcing or to refrain from personal attacks. —C.Fred (talk) 03:09, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

I haven't personally attacked anyone. I was blatantly attacked by 2 editors and simply called them biased. That's not a personal attack. But so be it, I understand I'm not falling in line. Wikipedia will die when left leaning editors ruin its credibility. Congrats on causing its demise. Engineer-005 (talk) 19:16, 24 May 2022 (UTC)