Jump to content

User talk:Stroopwafels: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 34: Line 34:
:{{ping|Dadylasry}} The article was previously nominated for deletion, with the AfD closed with the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Lasry|decision to redirect]] with Lasry failing to meet both [[WP:NPOL]] (no notability independent of his status/press coverage as a candidate for office) and [[WP:GNG]] (a high-level political staffer and mid-level business executive at best). Consider [[WP:DELREV]] for restoration, but it's unlikely to change the outcome here since there hasn't been any substantial change in Lasry's notability (no, polling higher after spending a morbillion dollars doesn't count). Also, I'm aware of your Twitter account! and would remind you and other coordinated editors of [[WP:NPOV]], as the contents as they are are pretty tilted and clear non-neutral (even if I don't dispute whether the claims made are factual). [[User:Stroopwafels|Stroopwafels]] ([[User talk:Stroopwafels#top|talk]]) 06:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
:{{ping|Dadylasry}} The article was previously nominated for deletion, with the AfD closed with the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Lasry|decision to redirect]] with Lasry failing to meet both [[WP:NPOL]] (no notability independent of his status/press coverage as a candidate for office) and [[WP:GNG]] (a high-level political staffer and mid-level business executive at best). Consider [[WP:DELREV]] for restoration, but it's unlikely to change the outcome here since there hasn't been any substantial change in Lasry's notability (no, polling higher after spending a morbillion dollars doesn't count). Also, I'm aware of your Twitter account! and would remind you and other coordinated editors of [[WP:NPOV]], as the contents as they are are pretty tilted and clear non-neutral (even if I don't dispute whether the claims made are factual). [[User:Stroopwafels|Stroopwafels]] ([[User talk:Stroopwafels#top|talk]]) 06:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
::Lasry obviously meets the point 2 of [[WP:POLITICAN]] based on latest news, I have sent the proof to [[WP:DELREV]] [[User:Dadylasry|Dadylasry]] ([[User talk:Dadylasry|talk]]) 14:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
::Lasry obviously meets the point 2 of [[WP:POLITICAN]] based on latest news, I have sent the proof to [[WP:DELREV]] [[User:Dadylasry|Dadylasry]] ([[User talk:Dadylasry|talk]]) 14:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

== May I ask you to add this endorsement? ==

I am new to wikipedia and routainly onnly care about physics, but today I see this endorseement in news: https://captimes.com/captimes/news/government/service-employees-union-backs-barnes-in-democratic-senate-primary/article_c296baef-99eb-5975-8b78-6d8bd26f2532.html however it is not added to the wiki page [[2022 United States Senate election in Wisconsin]], it seems you are the administrator of it, May I ask you to add it?

Revision as of 19:39, 22 June 2022

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Seattle City Council election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sara Nelson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep putting "Sattler" into Ann Davison's name?

Her name is just Ann Davison. "Sattler" is no longer part of her name and it wasn't her given name so I don't see any reason to put it in her Wikipedia Page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cygnusson (talkcontribs) 14:26, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's still her full name (per her PDC C1/committee registration for this cycle – "Ann D Sattler" – her husband is plastic surgeon Scott Sattler) even if her ballot designation has changed. Stroopwafels (talk) 21:03, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redguy07 graph

Hi. I'm Redguy07. I'm not upset, just confused on why I can't put that poll on the graph. The poll was on the same date as another poll so you call that "double counting". Redguy07 (talk) 12:51, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The numbers come from the same poll, the graph just prioritizes showing the version with the narrowest universe (here, likely voters). Stroopwafels (talk) 14:14, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask you to keep the wikipedia page of Alex Lasry?

I see you deleted the Wikipedia page"Alex Lasry", May I ask you to keep it? I think it ought to be kept for two reasons:Firstly as shown in wikipedia article 2022 United States Senate election in Wisconsin he is not a minor candidate but a candidate that comes close to the frontrunner in the latest two polls. Secondly though it do not have much contents now I can pledge to you there are many things about him that I can pledge to you I will use them to enrich its content in the following days. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dadylasry (talkcontribs) 04:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dadylasry: The article was previously nominated for deletion, with the AfD closed with the decision to redirect with Lasry failing to meet both WP:NPOL (no notability independent of his status/press coverage as a candidate for office) and WP:GNG (a high-level political staffer and mid-level business executive at best). Consider WP:DELREV for restoration, but it's unlikely to change the outcome here since there hasn't been any substantial change in Lasry's notability (no, polling higher after spending a morbillion dollars doesn't count). Also, I'm aware of your Twitter account! and would remind you and other coordinated editors of WP:NPOV, as the contents as they are are pretty tilted and clear non-neutral (even if I don't dispute whether the claims made are factual). Stroopwafels (talk) 06:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lasry obviously meets the point 2 of WP:POLITICAN based on latest news, I have sent the proof to WP:DELREV Dadylasry (talk) 14:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask you to add this endorsement?

I am new to wikipedia and routainly onnly care about physics, but today I see this endorseement in news: https://captimes.com/captimes/news/government/service-employees-union-backs-barnes-in-democratic-senate-primary/article_c296baef-99eb-5975-8b78-6d8bd26f2532.html however it is not added to the wiki page 2022 United States Senate election in Wisconsin, it seems you are the administrator of it, May I ask you to add it?