Jump to content

Talk:Comparison of text editors: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
comment
Added comment about user interface type being missing
Tag: Reverted
Line 15: Line 15:
Current Version of Notepad++ seems not to support ISO-8859.
Current Version of Notepad++ seems not to support ISO-8859.
25 September 2009.
25 September 2009.

== No Column for GUI versus Console ==
For example vim, vi are console based whereas XEmacs and Notepad++ are GUI based. This is useful and important information about how the user experiences the editor. Is this omitted so as not to have a flame war?


== Android ==
== Android ==

Revision as of 19:12, 15 August 2022

WikiProject iconSoftware: Computing List‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Missing lines in tables for Sublime Text

Please, could someone look at the tables and add the missing lines for Sublime Text (at least in two tables)? I have no idea why it's not there. Thanks.

ISO-8859 in Notepad++ v 5.5

Current Version of Notepad++ seems not to support ISO-8859. 25 September 2009.

No Column for GUI versus Console

For example vim, vi are console based whereas XEmacs and Notepad++ are GUI based. This is useful and important information about how the user experiences the editor. Is this omitted so as not to have a flame war?

Android

Why are no Android editors listed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.61.180.106 (talk) 13:26, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to add some. --Tuxman (talk) 11:36, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for that stupid answer. If I had the expertise to do so, I would've done so already, wouldn't I? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.61.180.106 (talk) 05:39, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If we knew any, we would have added some already, wouldn’t we? --Tuxman (talk) 12:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Wikidata

Ahoy,

is there any good reason that version updates are added manually in the list instead of just grabbing them from Wikidata? Tuxman (talk) 09:10, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that a kind IP has done a good deed here. Thank you, if you read this. :-) Tuxman (talk) 11:39, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Notepadqq

Why isn't notepadqq listed? I added it and it was removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.76.112.18 (talk) 18:57, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: Nevermind... I see with each software, an associated wikipedia article is expected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.76.112.18 (talk) 18:59, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

size of editor?

There's no source for any of that, and as usual in comparison-of topics, the data are mostly wrong. In a quick check, the Debian package for vim uses 29Mb for its runtime, and 2.7Mb for the program. The table states that vim uses 2.2Mb. There's a "vim-tiny" package which is 1.2Mb. Similar comments likely apply to the whole column. TEDickey (talk) 08:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't even think that the column does have any encyclopedic value. I'd agree to a complete removal. Tuxman (talk) 22:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
done TEDickey (talk) 11:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]