User talk:Mwarhead: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:[[Image:Stop_hand.svg|25px]] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you insert a [[Wikipedia:Spam|spam]] link{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you did to [[:{{{1}}}]]}}, you '''will''' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites [[meta:Talk:Spam blacklist|blacklisted]] as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from any site that uses the [[meta:Spam blacklist|MediaWiki spam blacklist]], which includes all of Wikimedia and Wikipedia. {{{2|}}}<!-- {{uw-spam4}} --> —[[User talk:Moondyne|Moondyne]] 00:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC) |
:[[Image:Stop_hand.svg|25px]] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you insert a [[Wikipedia:Spam|spam]] link{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you did to [[:{{{1}}}]]}}, you '''will''' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites [[meta:Talk:Spam blacklist|blacklisted]] as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from any site that uses the [[meta:Spam blacklist|MediaWiki spam blacklist]], which includes all of Wikimedia and Wikipedia. {{{2|}}}<!-- {{uw-spam4}} --> —[[User talk:Moondyne|Moondyne]] 00:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
== |
==Reply by Mwarhead== |
||
Being warned by two seperate people for the same thing? LOL. |
Being warned by two seperate people for the same thing? LOL. |
||
Revision as of 01:29, 28 February 2007
Gigabits
I've copied the text into here. you should note the following when preparing for recreation.
- There were three edit after your last, one of which removed external links considered by that editor as spammy.
- prior to my deletion, it had already been tagged as shown in the text for both notability and advertising by other editors
- If you recreate, I think the passages I've bolded in the text need reviewing - it's phrases like those that make it seem POV and advertising in style.
Good luck, Jimfbleak.talk.06:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- incidentally, I've deleted the first { in the tags so they don't show up in CSD, but if your recreation is essentially unchanged from last time, you ought to reactivate them. Jim —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jimfbleak (talk • contribs) 06:55, 13 January 2007 (UTC).
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in LAN gaming center. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. -- Satori Son 00:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Reply by Mwarhead
The article was not reverted it was updated. You have reverted it 3 times, ban yourself.
LAN center article
Be very carefull reverting...if you revert more than 3 times in 24 hrs you will be blocked asap. just a heads up so you don't get blocked. 66.93.251.114 00:16, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from any site that uses the MediaWiki spam blacklist, which includes all of Wikimedia and Wikipedia. —Moondyne 00:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Reply by Mwarhead
Being warned by two seperate people for the same thing? LOL.
The article was not reverted it was updated. The moderators have unjustly reverted it 3 times, ban yourself.