User talk:KLIFE88: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:31, 20 October 2022

Your revert edit summary

"Vandalism"

You don't seem to understand what vandalism actually is on Wikipedia. Content disputes are not vandalism, and it's also not something that another editor does that you disagree with. Please read and understand WP:VANDALISM first. Thanks! ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 03:49, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is vandalism when you delete content because you saw another account deleting them, you disagree on information provided with sources then start a talk other then deleting info that people worked hard gathering, especially when those info are backed up by official sites. KLIFE88 (talk) 23:26, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Your revert edit summary ==
-@[[User:KLIFE88|KLIFE88]] Hi, you reverted my edit on [[G-Dragon]] however your edit summary is problematic, incorrect, and seemingly trying to attack another editor who was simply following the Wikipedia guidelines ([[WP:GUIDELINES]]). Firstly, you added "{{tq|which went on to become one of the best-selling boy bands in the world}}" as per [[Special:diff/1099204098|this revision]] with the edit summary "{{tq|Confirmed by multiple reliable sources.}}" however you didn't provide a single new source to prove it hence violating [[WP:BURDEN]]. Secondly, I [[Special:diff/1099205663|reverted]] it because the sentence you added failed verification ([[WP:FAIL]]) as the existing [https://variety.com/2017/digital/news/bigbang-kpop-youtube-red-reality-show-1202399581/ Variety] source doesn't even stated such, in addition, to not able to [[WP:PROVEIT]] as per preceding sentence. Finally, you [[Special:diff/1099830529|reverted]] my revision but with problematic and incorrect edit summary of "{{tq|please stop deleting, the sources are clear and reliable. Unless you have other sources that contradict the info then this should never be deleted}}" when what you added back was "{{tq|which went on to become one of the best-selling boy bands in the world}}" but with new sources (one of which is [[WP:SYNTH]] hence I removed it given that the source doesn't explictly stated "{{tq|best-selling}}" or "{{tq|high-selling}}" or {{tq|highest-selling}}") provided hence why even mentioned "{{tq|please stop deleting}}" and "{{tq|Unless you have other sources that contradict the info then this should never be deleted}}"??? What you should instead input into the edit summary is simply "Added source" period to resolve the concern made instead what you seemingly trying to is attack another editor who was simply following the Wikipedia guidelines of which I quoted are [[WP:BURDEN]], [[WP:FAIL]], and [[WP:PROVEIT]]. This is incorrect behavior and needs to be corrected, hopefully you listen to my advice. Thanks you and happy editing! '''<span style="color:#f535aa">—</span> [[User:Paper9oll|<span style="background:#f535aa;color:#fff;padding:2px;border-radius:5px">Paper9oll</span>]] <span style="color:#f535aa">([[User talk:Paper9oll|🔔]] • [[Special:Contributions/Paper9oll|📝]])</span>''' 04:57, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
-:[[User:Paper9oll|Paper9oll]] The pages of Big Bang are continuously been edited out of reliable and correct info based on basically nothing, it's frustrating and delete years of researches to upgrade the pages. You as well deleted an info (which went on to become one of the best-selling boy bands in the world.) in July 19th, a simple opening of Big Bang own page will provide you with 5-6 links to strong sources to back it up, you can simply add them to G-Dragon page instead of complete deletion of the correct info, which what you did, that's why it's frustrating, so I keep saying please search for links and add them instead of deleting an entire information without any checking. Thank you. [[User:KLIFE88|KLIFE88]] ([[User talk:KLIFE88#top|talk]]) 20:27, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
-::@[[User:KLIFE88|KLIFE88]] Firstly, you're overreacting and even though you publicly stated on your user page that you are fans of Big Bang, please don't let your judgment get clouded otherwise you risk falling into [[WP:FANCRUFT]] category. Secondly, pertaining to "{{Tq|a simple opening of Big Bang own page will provide you with 5-6 links to strong sources to back it up, you can simply add them to G-Dragon page instead of complete deletion of the correct info, which what you did}}" as mentioned in the earlier reply on 23 July 2022 @ 04:57 UTC, this is your responsibility per [[WP:BURDEN]] to provide a source as you added the sentence yourself, not my responsibility. This in fact stated clearly on [[WP:BURDEN]] (if you even read it) in bold font quote "{{tq|The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material}}" in which you failed to do so despite knowing that there are references existing on [[Big Bang (band)]], in turn replying that "{{tq|a simple opening of Big Bang own page will provide you with 5-6 links to strong sources to back it up, you can simply add them to G-Dragon page}}" is simply ridiculous as I'm not the "{{tq|editor who adds or restores material}}". Anyway, I have make myself clear on what the issues was, this has also been communicated well to you and whether or not, you want to listen is up to you. Regardless, I hopefully don't see such things happening again be it on [[G-Dragon]], [[Big Bang (group)]], other Big Bang's articles (including other members' article), and other non-Big Bang related articles. '''<span style="color:#f535aa">—</span> [[User:Paper9oll|<span style="background:#f535aa;color:#fff;padding:2px;border-radius:5px">Paper9oll</span>]] <span style="color:#f535aa">([[User talk:Paper9oll|🔔]] • [[Special:Contributions/Paper9oll|📝]])</span>''' 05:15, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
 == "Vandalism" ==