Jump to content

User talk:Qzd: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notifying about edit warring noticeboard discussion.
Line 21: Line 21:


'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->[[User:thedefender35|''Td'']][[User talk:thedefender35|<sup style="color:DeepSkyBlue">she</sup>]][[special:contributions/thedefender35|<sup style="color:Magenta">/her</sup>]] 19:46, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->[[User:thedefender35|''Td'']][[User talk:thedefender35|<sup style="color:DeepSkyBlue">she</sup>]][[special:contributions/thedefender35|<sup style="color:Magenta">/her</sup>]] 19:46, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

== Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion ==
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. The thread is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Qzd reported by User:Thedefender35 (Result: )]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. [[User:thedefender35|''Td'']][[User talk:thedefender35|<sup style="color:DeepSkyBlue">she</sup>]][[special:contributions/thedefender35|<sup style="color:Magenta">/her</sup>]] 20:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:09, 24 October 2022

A message from SmsTechIT

SmsTechIT (talk) 01:49, 19 October 2022 (UTC) Hey, Im a teacher At southmoreland of 27 Years and i keep getting my edits deleted and i know what im talking about, this needs to stop.[reply]

You may know what you're talking about when you edit the Southmoreland page, but the problem is that you don't know how Wikipedia works. -- Cosmic (talk) 01:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

XXXXVIII

why have you changed the name back? the correct roman spelling for 48 is XLVIII FinnX2 (talk) 21:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't matter what the 'correct' numbering is; we use the notation sources use i.e. Wehrmacht and historians. Qzd (talk) 21:16, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

edit warring

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Tdshe/her 19:46, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Qzd reported by User:Thedefender35 (Result: ). Thank you. Tdshe/her 20:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]