User talk:Breellis178: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:40, 4 November 2022

Please post newer messages under older messages! Breellis178 (talk) 18:15, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Ellidon217 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:19, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you block me? See request below. Breellis178 (talk) 14:06, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Breellis178 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, why was I blocked as a sockpuppet? I did nothing wrong and this is a legitimate account! Did I commit the crime of going to the same school as Ellidon217? It is not my fault that we shared an IP address and I ask that you unblock me.Breellis178 (talk) 13:23, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We're not wasting further time with your spurious claims. Further lying will result in loss of your talk page access.OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:05, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Opening three concurrent unblocks on different accounts (this one, User_talk:BE172-08 and at UTRS ticket under Ellidon217) is not a good strategy. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I retract this unblock request.Breellis178 (talk) 17:40, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 {{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, why was I blocked as a sockpuppet? I did nothing wrong and this is a legitimate account! Did I commit the crime of going to the same school as Ellidon217? It is not my fault that we shared an IP address and I ask that you unblock me.[[User:Breellis178|Breellis178]] ([[User talk:Breellis178#top|talk]]) 13:23, 4 November 2022 (UTC) |decline = We're not wasting further time with your spurious claims. Further lying will result in loss of your talk page access.<b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 16:05, 4 November 2022 (UTC)}}
-{{unblock|I request that OhNo It's Jamie does not review this unblock, as they obviously have a vendetta against me. I admit that I am a sockpuppet of BE172-08 and Ellidon 217. I ask that you give me a second chance on this account. I just want to show that I can make productive edits, and I am not as bad as everyone thinks I am. I have shown on this account and BE172-08 that I am capable of making helpful, constructive, edits. While I have had a bad past, I believe that I can have a bright future as a Wikipedia editor, and I will leave the [[Seneca Ridge Middle School]] issue alone, realizing that there is no point in continuing the dispute. If unblocked, I will make constructive edits related to Transportation, Politics, History, and Northern Virginia. I will copyedit, add links to pages, add citations, and even expand articles. I just need a second chance to do what I didn't do before, to actually be a good Wikipedia editor. I apologise for all of my previous offenses, and I promise that I will never sockpuppet, block evade, lie to administrators, edit war, or remove notices from my talk page again. I sockpuppeted because I waited for 8 months, I made the standard offer, and I was completely ignored. That does not excuse my actions in any shape or form, but I request that you have mercy on me, and unblock me on some kind of probation. I will tread very carefully, and not get involved in controversies and disputes, knowing that doing so will get me blocked with no chance of unblocking ever again. To conclude, I will change my actions and be a constructive editor to Wikipedia, but I just need a second chance. If you don't grant me  a second chance, I will completely understand, and I will not try again for some time, but I ask that you seriously consider my request.[[User:Breellis178|Breellis178]] ([[User talk:Breellis178#top|talk]]) 17:00, 4 November 2022 (UTC)}}
 : Opening three concurrent unblocks on different accounts (this one, [[User_talk:BE172-08]] and at UTRS ticket under Ellidon217) is not a good strategy. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 17:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
+:Sorry, I retract this unblock request.[[User:Breellis178|Breellis178]] ([[User talk:Breellis178#top|talk]]) 17:40, 4 November 2022 (UTC)