Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classical homeopathy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:05, 2 March 2007

Classical homeopathy

Possible POV fork of Homeopathy, though, to be fair, there are strong opinions on Homeopathy, and it may just be that only one side edited it. However, in any case, the article admits the subject is almost undefinable as seperate to Homeopathy, except that it's somehow better than more general homeopathy. Should become a redirect, I think. Adam Cuerden ^talk 17:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

keep I am one of the editors of the page, it is an old page and it has been worked on by a lot of people, but it needs a major rewrite and it could also be shortened. There is a list of "To do" items in the article's talk page, this is a good start, I think, and I think everyone should read those before maing a decision here, but I will of course accept the decision of the majority and some of what Adam Cuerden says is also valid Pernambuco 19:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 19:04, 2 March 2007 edit Pernambuco (talk \| contribs) 1,533 edits keep, I am one of the established editors of that page ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:05, 2 March 2007 edit undo Pernambuco (talk \| contribs) 1,533 edits keep, I am one of the established editors of that page Next edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Possible POV fork of [[Homeopathy]], though, to be fair, there are strong opinions on Homeopathy, and it may just be that only one side edited it. However, in any case, the article admits the subject is almost undefinable as seperate to Homeopathy, except that it's somehow better than more general homeopathy. Should become a redirect, I think. [[User:Adam Cuerden\|Adam Cuerden]] <sup>[[User_talk:Adam Cuerden\|talk]]</sup> 17:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)		Possible POV fork of [[Homeopathy]], though, to be fair, there are strong opinions on Homeopathy, and it may just be that only one side edited it. However, in any case, the article admits the subject is almost undefinable as seperate to Homeopathy, except that it's somehow better than more general homeopathy. Should become a redirect, I think. [[User:Adam Cuerden\|Adam Cuerden]] <sup>[[User_talk:Adam Cuerden\|talk]]</sup> 17:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

	* '''keep''' I am one of the editors of the page, it is an old page and it has been worked on by a lot of people, but it needs a major rewrite and it could also be shortened. There is a list of "To do" items in the article's talk page, this is a good start, I think, and I think everyone should read those before maing a decision here, but I will of course accept the decision of the majority and some of what Adam Cuerden says is also valid [[User:Pernambuco\|Pernambuco]] 19:04, 2 March 2007 (UTC)		* '''keep''' I am one of the editors of the page, it is an old page and it has been worked on by a lot of people, but it needs a major rewrite and it could also be shortened. There is a list of "To do" items in the article's talk page, this is a good start, I think, and I think everyone should read those before maing a decision here, but I will of course accept the decision of the majority and some of what Adam Cuerden says is also valid [[User:Pernambuco\|Pernambuco]] 19:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)