Jump to content

User:Informationageuser: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Added member userboxes for film
Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
m User page update
Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Service award progress|year=2022|month=7|day=3|edits=195|displayall=[195]}}
{{Service award progress|year=2022|month=7|day=3|edits=209|displayall=[209]}}
<table class="wikitable" style="width:100%">
<table class="wikitable" style="width:100%">
<tr>
<tr>
<td>
<td>
{{service awards|year=2022|month=7|day=3|edits=195|format=ubxmedal}}
{{service awards|year=2022|month=7|day=3|edits=209|format=ubxmedal}}
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>

Revision as of 03:48, 11 December 2022

Currently, this editor has earned the Novice Editor service award.

To get to the next level, Novice Editor, level 2, they need to meet the editing requirement.
Progress towards the next level (by edits): [ 9 / 200 ]

4.5% completed

  

Progress towards the next level (by time): [ 803.5 days / 15 days ]

5356.7% completed

  

This editor is a Novice Editor and is entitled to display this Service Badge.

This user is a vandalism patroller.

Hello Wikipedia friends!

One night I was watching a show and was surprised to hear a character say something that was such a specific reference, I had to pause and look up the phrase and the show on Wikipedia. Long story short, it wasn’t on either page, and it was significant enough that I figured it should be. I had no intention on becoming an editor on Wikipedia, but if I can help bring relevant info to the world, why not?

Some areas of expertise or interest in no particular order: marketing, consumer behavior, grammar, e-commerce, user experience, branding, tv and movies, sci-fi, theater, dance, emerging technology, fashion, skincare, luxury goods, video games, pharmacology, genetics, outdoor and extreme sports, aviation, psychology, sociology, academic and institutional research methodologies, research errors and biases, belief systems, and more…

Please don’t be afraid to call me out (constructively) on my edits if you come across any (hard to know whether something was done right when all you hear is radio silence). I’m new here and would genuinely love to learn how to contribute effectively. :)

Cheers mate.