Jump to content

Talk:Strength (mathematical logic): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 173.35.108.182 - ""
Strength vs. Weakness
Line 3: Line 3:


Shouldn't that read: "<math>\alpha</math> is said to be as strong as a logic <math>\beta</math> if every [[elementary class]] in <math>\beta</math> is an elementary class in <math>\alpha</math>?" At least that's what the cited reference (Extended logics: the general framework) appears to be stating. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/173.35.108.182|173.35.108.182]] ([[User talk:173.35.108.182|talk]]) 02:00, 4 February 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Shouldn't that read: "<math>\alpha</math> is said to be as strong as a logic <math>\beta</math> if every [[elementary class]] in <math>\beta</math> is an elementary class in <math>\alpha</math>?" At least that's what the cited reference (Extended logics: the general framework) appears to be stating. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/173.35.108.182|173.35.108.182]] ([[User talk:173.35.108.182|talk]]) 02:00, 4 February 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Strength vs. Weakness ==
But this article does not inform when one system is weaker and the other stronger. Can some elaborate, or explain why non is need?

Revision as of 17:32, 13 December 2022

WikiProject iconMathematics Stub‑class Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.
WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Logic Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Logic

Shouldn't that read: " is said to be as strong as a logic if every elementary class in is an elementary class in ?" At least that's what the cited reference (Extended logics: the general framework) appears to be stating. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.35.108.182 (talk) 02:00, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strength vs. Weakness

But this article does not inform when one system is weaker and the other stronger. Can some elaborate, or explain why non is need?