User talk:Bambablock: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Adding sockpuppetry block notice per w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The basis of (using spihelper.js) |
Bambablock (talk | contribs) →Western world changes: Reply |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hey, I noticed that you have some complaints about the [[Western world]] article. Do you have specific changes you'd like to see? I think you might have some fair points, but your [[WP:SOCK|methods]] aren't going to get you anywhere within the Wikipedia bureaucracy. What's your main account? I might be willing to help if you if I agree with your proposal. — <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User talk:Freoh|Freoh]]</span> 18:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC) |
Hey, I noticed that you have some complaints about the [[Western world]] article. Do you have specific changes you'd like to see? I think you might have some fair points, but your [[WP:SOCK|methods]] aren't going to get you anywhere within the Wikipedia bureaucracy. What's your main account? I might be willing to help if you if I agree with your proposal. — <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User talk:Freoh|Freoh]]</span> 18:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
:Thanks in advance. My concern as explained throughly since last November is that edits by user Rim sim began on 19 November, were accepted with that bias of '''"what makes the West is white Christianity"'''. Rim sim's even added about ancient Greco-Roman roots of race (white as opposed to asian) this month; but if so that white christian Europe makes the Western world, how is the Orthodox world supposed to be understood since not certainly Western but "intimately related" at least (per lede's map's description)? |
|||
:I am sure lede should read more like "what makes the West is white medieval clerical heads who, in collusion with imperial did root the Western world" in religion wars since about the turn of the millennium (by East-West schism if 1054). As this is acknowledged and academic since ever. [[User:Bambablock|Bambablock]] ([[User talk:Bambablock#top|talk]]) 06:22, 19 January 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Blocked as a sockpuppet == |
== Blocked as a sockpuppet == |
||
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing for [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|abusing multiple accounts]] as a sockpuppet of {{no ping|1=The basis of|label1=User:The basis of}} per the evidence presented at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The basis of]]. Note that multiple accounts are [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but '''not for ''[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|illegitimate]]'' reasons''', and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Edits by and on behalf of banned editors|reverted]] or [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G5|deleted]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. <b>[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]</b> ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]] • [[Special:Log/Callanecc|logs]]) 04:57, 19 January 2023 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-sockblock --> |
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing for [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|abusing multiple accounts]] as a sockpuppet of {{no ping|1=The basis of|label1=User:The basis of}} per the evidence presented at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The basis of]]. Note that multiple accounts are [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but '''not for ''[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|illegitimate]]'' reasons''', and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Edits by and on behalf of banned editors|reverted]] or [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G5|deleted]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. <b>[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]</b> ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]] • [[Special:Log/Callanecc|logs]]) 04:57, 19 January 2023 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-sockblock --> |
Revision as of 06:22, 19 January 2023
Western world changes
Hey, I noticed that you have some complaints about the Western world article. Do you have specific changes you'd like to see? I think you might have some fair points, but your methods aren't going to get you anywhere within the Wikipedia bureaucracy. What's your main account? I might be willing to help if you if I agree with your proposal. — Freoh 18:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks in advance. My concern as explained throughly since last November is that edits by user Rim sim began on 19 November, were accepted with that bias of "what makes the West is white Christianity". Rim sim's even added about ancient Greco-Roman roots of race (white as opposed to asian) this month; but if so that white christian Europe makes the Western world, how is the Orthodox world supposed to be understood since not certainly Western but "intimately related" at least (per lede's map's description)?
- I am sure lede should read more like "what makes the West is white medieval clerical heads who, in collusion with imperial did root the Western world" in religion wars since about the turn of the millennium (by East-West schism if 1054). As this is acknowledged and academic since ever. Bambablock (talk) 06:22, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:The basis of per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The basis of. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:57, 19 January 2023 (UTC)