Talk:Enhanced Imaging System: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:09, 8 March 2007

This article deals with a military black project.

Because of the nature of such projects, the most authoritative sources (any involved governments and defense contractors) may not even acknowledge its existence. The most reliable sources may be highly speculative.

Please ensure that the article is well and reliably sourced and does not contain unverifiable information or vague predictions.
For more details, see the black project working group of the military history project.

Maybe some things people shouldnt know about. I find theres quite abit of information that is "need to know". Maybe some revisions on certain articles need to be placed.

I don't quite understand that. If it's known to reliable sources, there's nothing new about describing them here... 68.39.174.238 17:10, 12 August 2006 (UTC) (BTW, sign your talk page comments)[reply]

However, this article seems to be particularly poorly sourced and light on information. I don't need a page to tell me a bunch of stuff that science fiction writers have said about a satellite (which may not even exist). Personally, I'd vote for deletion, or at least sticking a warning at the top of the page. 88.96.214.6 13:09, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 02:09, 10 December 2006 edit GeeJo (talk \| contribs) Administrators 26,225 edits Shifting permanent editor-related template to talk page. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:09, 8 March 2007 edit undo 88.96.214.6 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:

	:I don't quite understand that. If it's known to reliable sources, there's nothing new about describing them here... [[User:68.39.174.238\|68.39.174.238]] 17:10, 12 August 2006 (UTC) (BTW, sign your talk page comments)		:I don't quite understand that. If it's known to reliable sources, there's nothing new about describing them here... [[User:68.39.174.238\|68.39.174.238]] 17:10, 12 August 2006 (UTC) (BTW, sign your talk page comments)

			However, this article seems to be particularly poorly sourced and light on information. I don't need a page to tell me a bunch of stuff that science fiction writers have said about a satellite (which may not even exist). Personally, I'd vote for deletion, or at least sticking a warning at the top of the page. [[User:88.96.214.6\|88.96.214.6]] 13:09, 8 March 2007 (UTC)