Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Stübing: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
keep
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
*'''Keep''' per [[WP:CRIMINAL]]#2 and the societal and legal impacts it had in Germany. --[[user:Hannes Röst|hroest]] 20:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per [[WP:CRIMINAL]]#2 and the societal and legal impacts it had in Germany. --[[user:Hannes Röst|hroest]] 20:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
*:BLP policy cannot be superseded by the notability *guideline*. - [[User:Balph Eubank|Who is John Galt?]] [[User talk:Balph Eubank|✉]] 22:40, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
*:BLP policy cannot be superseded by the notability *guideline*. - [[User:Balph Eubank|Who is John Galt?]] [[User talk:Balph Eubank|✉]] 22:40, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per [[WP:BLP1E]] criteria 3, which says that a separate article should be avoided if {{tq|the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented. [[John Hinckley Jr.]], for example, has a separate article because the single event he was associated with, the [[Reagan assassination attempt]], was significant, and his role was both substantial and well documented}}. While Mr. Stübing's crimes may not have been as significant, I see this as analogous to that case. Since BLP1E requires all three conditions to be met, an article seems justified especially as his crimes themselves do not have one. [[User:Highway 89|Highway 89]] ([[User talk:Highway 89|talk]]) 01:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per [[WP:BLP1E]] criteria 3, which says that a separate article should be avoided if {{tq|the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented. [[John Hinckley Jr.]], for example, has a separate article because the single event he was associated with, the [[Reagan assassination attempt]], was significant, and his role was both substantial and well documented}}. While Mr. Stübing's crimes may not have been as significant, they certainly seem to be notable and I see this as an analogous case. Since BLP1E requires all three conditions to be met, an article seems justified especially as his crimes themselves do not have one. [[User:Highway 89|Highway 89]] ([[User talk:Highway 89|talk]]) 01:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:03, 8 March 2023

Patrick Stübing

Patrick Stübing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a WP:BLP1E. - Who is John Galt? 18:54, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Crime, and Germany. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:58, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:CRIMINAL#2 and the societal and legal impacts it had in Germany. --hroest 20:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    BLP policy cannot be superseded by the notability *guideline*. - Who is John Galt? 22:40, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:BLP1E criteria 3, which says that a separate article should be avoided if the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented. John Hinckley Jr., for example, has a separate article because the single event he was associated with, the Reagan assassination attempt, was significant, and his role was both substantial and well documented. While Mr. Stübing's crimes may not have been as significant, they certainly seem to be notable and I see this as an analogous case. Since BLP1E requires all three conditions to be met, an article seems justified especially as his crimes themselves do not have one. Highway 89 (talk) 01:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]