Talk:Pizza Tower/GA1: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 19:13, 17 May 2023

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: PerryPerryD (talk · contribs) 18:21, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am PerryPerryD, I will be performing this GA Review under the GA criteria. I have already noticed this doesn't have any quick violations to address. I will be performing a deep look at the article. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 18:21, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

The article does not contain a "Plot" section, and most of the plot details appear to be merged with the Gameplay section, I would advise separating these. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 18:48, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

This article has a proper References and Notes section, With the notes section actually being a clever idea for multiple sources for a claim. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 19:08, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

b. (citations to reliable sources):

c. (OR):

All claims in this article have Citations. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 19:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

Each quote is properly marked and addressed, and the majority of the article is original writing. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 19:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

The article is broad in its coverage, mentioning all major details of the game itself. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 18:59, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

b. (focused):

In the music section, the second paragraph does not mention Pizza Tower and provides more context on the Composer's previous work. May not be needed. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 18:59, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:

No weasle words or bias is found in the article apart from Quotations of reviews. The criticism section addresses negatives of the game as well as the positives. Pass. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 19:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:

There is multiple cases of I.P Vandalism, but other than that, No reverts of content. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 18:48, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

Both images in this article are low quality and have Fair-Use Rationale attached to them. Both images do not have a Public Domain alternative. Pass. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 18:52, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Image 1, The Cover Art image is not captioned on the article itself, but is captioned on the Image's data. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 18:52, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
     Verify that the 5 types of statements listed above are supported by inline citations. Check if there are any unreliable sources (see [[WP:RSP]]), including self-published sources and user-generated content. -->
 #::
-#: c. ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check| <!-- Insert y, n or ? --> }}
+#: c. ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|y <!-- Insert y, n or ? --> }}
 #:: <!-- 2c. Check at least some of the cited sources to see if they verify the article text. The article should not synthesize material from multiple sources to reach a conclusion not stated by any of them. -->
+#::  All claims in this article have Citations. [[User:PerryPerryD|<span style="background:black; color:#00ffa6; padding:2px; ">PerryPerryD</span>]] <small>[[User_Talk:PerryPerryD|Talk To Me]]</small> 19:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-#::
 #: d. ''([[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyvio]] and [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarism]])'': {{GAList/check|y <!-- Insert y, n or ? --> }}
 #:: <!-- 2d. While verifying citations, check if any text has been copied or closely paraphrased into the article. Earwig's tool can help check for plagiarism of online sources (https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios), but it should not replace manual checks as it cannot fully detect close paraphrasing. -->