User talk:Gugrak: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted |
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==[[Posy (given name)]]== |
|||
I have asked for a third opinion on the appropriate request for third opinion message board. I have described the conflict as “Dispute about relevance of content, reliable sources, and adding an image to illustrate the article.” [[User:Bookworm857158367|Bookworm857158367]] ([[User talk:Bookworm857158367|talk]]) 16:08, 31 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Albanian–Greek Border War]] == |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Albanian%E2%80%93Greek_Border_War&diff=prev&oldid=1157697523 I don't get it]: which of the two sources is supposed to be primary? This [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Albanian%E2%80%93Greek_Border_War&diff=prev&oldid=1157687762 "Stoxos" thing?] That is ''clearly'' not a primary source, and if you think it is, you don't understand what a "primary source" is. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 12:24, 31 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
I asked you this question, and I think you should answer it. If you do not, then you should not be surprised to find yourself sanctioned, for being incapable of distinguishing and assessing sources in a contentious topics are, and displaying that while edit warring. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 01:47, 1 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:Sorry, I got confused on which source. I was referring to this one https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Albanian%E2%80%93Greek_Border_War&diff=prev&oldid=1157581181 and obviously got mixed up as to which was being cited, which is not helpful. I'll be more careful. [[User:Gugrak|Gugrak]] ([[User talk:Gugrak#top|talk]]) 02:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Commons-emblem-notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] You have recently made edits related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe. This is a standard message to inform you that the Balkans or Eastern Europe is a designated contentious topic. This message <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see [[Wikipedia:Contentious topics]]. <!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert --> |
|||
== Edit warring at [[Ben Roberts-Smith]] == |
== Edit warring at [[Ben Roberts-Smith]] == |
||
Revision as of 12:24, 2 June 2023
Edit warring at Ben Roberts-Smith
Hi Gurak. I'm not suggesting there is anything wrong with your edits at Ben Roberts-Smith, but you have made around eight reverts to the article in the past 24 hours. ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]) While you may argue some edits are justified under exception #7, this is likely a violation of WP:3RR. Violations can result in editors getting blocked, so at this stage you may want to discuss issues you have on the Talk page. Vladimir.copic (talk) 03:03, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Vladimir.copic:I was the one who started the discussion on the talk page. This is a very clear example of something that falls under #7