User talk:100.16.203.133: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:28, 18 July 2023

July 2023

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Crustacean, you may be blocked from editing. Please give a valid reason to delete mention of Hexapods in Crustacean beyond your personal incredulousness, or please stop edit-warring.--Mr Fink (talk) 18:56, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is okay, I was just making sure It wouldn't cause panic 100.16.203.133 (talk) 19:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Crustacean. --Mr Fink (talk) 19:07, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete your account so my change can be permanent. Please. 100.16.203.133 (talk) 20:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PhilKnight (talk) 19:19, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was just trying to make more sense. 100.16.203.133 (talk) 20:28, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 20:25, 18 July 2023 edit 100.16.203.133 (talk) →July 2023: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:28, 18 July 2023 edit undo 100.16.203.133 (talk) →Edit warring: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply Next edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:

	'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule\|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting\|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:PhilKnight\|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight\|talk]]) 19:19, 18 July 2023 (UTC)		'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule\|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting\|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:PhilKnight\|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight\|talk]]) 19:19, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

			:Sorry, I was just trying to make more sense. [[Special:Contributions/100.16.203.133\|100.16.203.133]] ([[User talk:100.16.203.133#top\|talk]]) 20:28, 18 July 2023 (UTC)