Talk:Zotiel (angel): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 15:49, 23 July 2023

This page was proposed for deletion by Edward-Woodrow (talk · contribs) on 22 July 2023.

Re: tagging for proposed deletion

I don't think this article meets the criteria for deletion because the angel has been mentioned in literature, particularly in both primary and secondary sources albeit not as many as the other angels. It wasn't constructed to vandalize or disparage anything. How many sources (or "secondary analyses" as the nominator mentioned) would I need to add or cite? Can you be more specific in your suggestions instead of being too broad? Pcbyed (talk) 21:37, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Paul Christian B. Yang-ed: What I meant was that there was no clear indication of notability- significant secondary coverage. One mention in one religious text doesn't bode well for notability. I still believe this topic is unnotable, and will nominate it for deletion, so that other editors can weigh in. Consensus will decide. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 14:44, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. This is noted. I removed the tag a while ago to contest the nomination. I would welcome alternatives, such as inclusion of the discussions here under some other article where you and other people may find better or more useful. Pcbyed (talk) 15:49, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 14:44, 23 July 2023 edit Cremastra (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 20,501 edits →Re: tagging for proposed deletion: Reply Tag: Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:49, 23 July 2023 edit undo Paul Christian B. Yang-ed (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 754 edits →Re: tagging for proposed deletion: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:{{ping\|Paul Christian B. Yang-ed}} What I meant was that there was no clear indication of notability- [[WP:GNG\|significant secondary coverage]]. One mention in one religious text doesn't bode well for notability. I still believe this topic is unnotable, and will nominate it for deletion, so that other editors can weigh in. Consensus will decide. [[User:Edward-Woodrow\|Edward-Woodrow]] :) <sub><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:Edward-Woodrow\|talk]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sub> 14:44, 23 July 2023 (UTC)		:{{ping\|Paul Christian B. Yang-ed}} What I meant was that there was no clear indication of notability- [[WP:GNG\|significant secondary coverage]]. One mention in one religious text doesn't bode well for notability. I still believe this topic is unnotable, and will nominate it for deletion, so that other editors can weigh in. Consensus will decide. [[User:Edward-Woodrow\|Edward-Woodrow]] :) <sub><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:Edward-Woodrow\|talk]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sub> 14:44, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
			::Ok. This is noted. I removed the tag a while ago to contest the nomination. I would welcome alternatives, such as inclusion of the discussions here under some other article where you and other people may find better or more useful. [[User:Paul Christian B. Yang-ed\|Pcbyed]] ([[User talk:Paul Christian B. Yang-ed\|talk]]) 15:49, 23 July 2023 (UTC)