Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Orchomen: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted
Tag: Reverted
Line 15: Line 15:
'''Additionally, checkusers will not publicly connect an account with an IP address per the privacy policy except in extremely rare circumstances.'''
'''Additionally, checkusers will not publicly connect an account with an IP address per the privacy policy except in extremely rare circumstances.'''


I don't see anything exceptional here. The blanking of talkpages isn't what's problematic, what's problematic is {{u|Bookworm857158367}} publicly tagging linking multiple IPs to
I don't see anything exceptional here.[[Special:Contributions/91.72.187.50|91.72.187.50]] ([[User talk:91.72.187.50|talk]]) 10:07, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
an account without being a CU, , and admin, or an SPI having taken place.[[Special:Contributions/91.72.187.50|91.72.187.50]] ([[User talk:91.72.187.50|talk]]) 10:07, 14 September 2023 (UTC)


====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====

Revision as of 10:18, 14 September 2023

Orchomen

Orchomen (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
This case's socks should have their talk page and email access revoked due to abuse.


14 September 2023

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

The editors User:2.48.102.82 and User:37.245.43.126 are exhibiting similar interests and editing behavior to the accounts below, at least one of which was previously banned as a suspected sockpuppet of User:Orchomen. User:2.48.102.82 blanked that page multiple times and also blanked the page at User:37.245.43.126 multiple times. These two IP addresses also returned to editing some of the same articles edited by the other addresses listed, including Posy (given name). These addresses also all appear to be based in the United Arab Emirates. While this editor's or editors' editing of articles in the past day or so appears to be unobjectionable, the blanking of pages is problematic and there was apparently previous behavior that led to the User:Orchomen account and subsequent sockpuppets being suspended. The User:Gugrak account was banned as a suspected sockpuppet a couple of months ago. If this editor is the same individual, it would seem to be be more appropriate to ask to have the original account unblocked and acknowledge edits made using the other account and IP addresses. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 07:35, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Additionally, checkusers will not publicly connect an account with an IP address per the privacy policy except in extremely rare circumstances.

I don't see anything exceptional here. The blanking of talkpages isn't what's problematic, what's problematic is Bookworm857158367 publicly tagging linking multiple IPs to

an account without being a CU, , and admin, or an SPI having taken place.91.72.187.50 (talk) 10:07, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments