Talk:Distribution Media Format: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:00, 24 September 2023

Computing Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Microsoft Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

DMF vs. XDF

Hi, I think the MS DMF and IBM XDF 3.25 floppy formats should be discussed in one article. Some details are very different, but both formats are for ordinary floppies. Windows virtual PC supports both formats. –89.204.153.130 (talk) 07:47, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While at it the fdformat stub could also profit from a merged "odd and ancient DOS floppy formats" article. –89.204.153.130 (talk) 07:57, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While these articles are short and could see some expansion, I don't see a merge as a particularly good idea. DMF is just an ordinary floppy format with minor parameter tweaking, nothing really exiting. However, 2MGUI and XDF utilize unique formatting techniques requiring direct hardware access. Therefore they should be expanded and cross-linked, but not merged, in my opinion. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 19:34, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that leaves DMF and fdformat as suggested. The most exciting fdformat detail is the driver or TSR faking the BIOS floppy parameters on the fly with hex. digits in a decimal BCD value — I forgot the vintage 199mumble details, but it was in the direction of using 0x2A for decimal 30, where only 0x20…0x29 (BCD 20…29) are allowed, when 0x30 (BCD 30) is unsupported. –89.204.153.237 (talk) 20:14, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Merge

There has been no concensus on the Merge proposal. Removing the Tag. Kobuu (talk) 14:02, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

physical description

How, HOW standard FDD controllers write 21 sectors instead of 18? Where they can fit? The article TERRIBLY lacks of such details! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.195.21.216 (talk) 23:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{WikiProject Computing|class=Stub|importance=|auto=yes}}
+{{WikiProject Microsoft}}
 == DMF vs. XDF ==