Michael Jarrett (judge): Difference between revisions
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Removed parameters. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | #UCB_webform 406/3850 |
Apollo1986 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''Michael Jarrett''' is a Judge of the [[Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-10-15|title=Appointments to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)|url=https://ministers.ag.gov.au/media-centre/appointments-federal-circuit-and-family-court-australia-division-1-15-10-2021|access-date=2022-01-30|website=Our ministers – Attorney-General’s portfolio|language=en}}</ref> He was previously a Judge of the [[Federal Circuit Court of Australia]] until its merger with the [[Family Court of Australia]]. Before then, he was a Federal Magistrate of the '''Federal Magistrates Court of Australia''', before it was named the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. Jarrett has presided over a variety of cases, including [[family law]], [[administrative law]], [[bankruptcy law|bankruptcy]], [[copyright law|copyright]], [[human rights law|human rights]], [[industrial law]], and [[consumer law|trade practices]]. Prior to being a judge, Jarrett was a [[barrister]]. |
'''Michael Jarrett''' is a Judge of the [[Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-10-15|title=Appointments to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)|url=https://ministers.ag.gov.au/media-centre/appointments-federal-circuit-and-family-court-australia-division-1-15-10-2021|access-date=2022-01-30|website=Our ministers – Attorney-General’s portfolio|language=en}}</ref> He was previously a Judge of the [[Federal Circuit Court of Australia]] until its merger with the [[Family Court of Australia]]. Before then, he was a Federal Magistrate of the '''Federal Magistrates Court of Australia''', before it was named the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. Jarrett has presided over a variety of cases, including [[family law]], [[administrative law]], [[bankruptcy law|bankruptcy]], [[copyright law|copyright]], [[human rights law|human rights]], [[industrial law]], and [[consumer law|trade practices]]. Prior to being a judge, Jarrett was a [[barrister]]. |
||
In 2016, Jarrett decided an action involving three [[Queensland University of Technology]] (QUT) students who were accused of racial vilification under [[Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975|Section 18C of the ''Racial Discrimination Act 1975'' (Cth)]].<ref name='abcnews'>{{Cite news|url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-09/professor-gillian-triggs-racism-defamation-suit-tony-morris-qc/8008606|title=President of the Australian Human Rights Commission facing possible defamation action|date=2016-11-09|work=[[ABC News (Australia)|ABC News]]|access-date=2017-04-19}}</ref> One of the students was alleged to have breached Section 18C because of a [[Facebook]] post which read: "Just got kicked out of the unsigned [[Indigenous Australians|Indigenous]] computer room. QUT stopping [[Racial segregation|segregation]] with segregation."<ref name='sbs1'>{{Cite news|url=http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2016/11/04/lawyer-criticises-gillian-triggs-18c-university-case-thrown-out|title=Lawyer criticises Gillian Triggs as 18C university case thrown out|date=2016-11-04|work=[[SBS World News]]|access-date=2017-04-19}}</ref><ref name='conversation' /> In November 2016, Jarrett held the claim had no reasonable prospects of success and threw out the lawsuit.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://sterlinglawqld.com/identity-politics-political-correctness-and-section-18c-of-the-racial-discrimination-act|title=Identity politics, political correctness and Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act|date=4 August 2017|access-date=26 December 2018|publisher=Sterling Law}}</ref><ref name='conversation'>{{Cite news|url=https://theconversation.com/qut-discrimination-case-exposes-human-rights-commission-failings-68235|title=QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings|last=Forrester, Joshua. Zimmerman, Augusto. Finlay, Lorraine|date=2016-11-07|work=[[The Conversation (website)|The Conversation]]|access-date=2017-04-19}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/nov/04/qut-computer-lab-racial-discrimination-lawsuit-thrown-out |title=QUT computer lab racial discrimination lawsuit thrown out |last=Chan |first=Gabrielle |date=4 November 2016 |website=The Guardian Australia |access-date=4 December 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCCA/2016/2853.html?context=1 |title=Prior v Queensland University of Technology & Ors (No.2) [2016] FCCA 2853 (4 November 2016) |last=Jarrett |first=Michael (judge) |date=4 November 2016 |website=Australasian Legal Information Institute |publisher=[[Australasian Legal Information Institute|AustLII]] |access-date=4 December 2016}}</ref><ref name='smh2'>{{Cite news|url=http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/gillian-triggs-hits-back-at-deeply-misleading-malcolm-turnbull-over-18c-claims-20161107-gsjun8.html|title=Gillian Triggs hits back at 'deeply misleading' Malcolm Turnbull over 18C claims|last=Gordon|first=Michael|date=2016-11-07|work=[[Sydney Morning Herald]]|access-date=2017-04-19}}</ref> |
In 2016, Jarrett decided an action involving three [[Queensland University of Technology]] (QUT) students who were accused of racial vilification under [[Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975|Section 18C of the ''Racial Discrimination Act 1975'' (Cth)]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://sterlinglawqld.com/identity-politics-political-correctness-and-section-18c-of-the-racial-discrimination-act|title=Identity politics, political correctness and Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act|date=4 August 2017|access-date=26 December 2018|publisher=Sterling Law}}</ref> <ref name='abcnews'>{{Cite news|url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-09/professor-gillian-triggs-racism-defamation-suit-tony-morris-qc/8008606|title=President of the Australian Human Rights Commission facing possible defamation action|date=2016-11-09|work=[[ABC News (Australia)|ABC News]]|access-date=2017-04-19}}</ref> One of the students was alleged to have breached Section 18C because of a [[Facebook]] post which read: "Just got kicked out of the unsigned [[Indigenous Australians|Indigenous]] computer room. QUT stopping [[Racial segregation|segregation]] with segregation."<ref name='sbs1'>{{Cite news|url=http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2016/11/04/lawyer-criticises-gillian-triggs-18c-university-case-thrown-out|title=Lawyer criticises Gillian Triggs as 18C university case thrown out|date=2016-11-04|work=[[SBS World News]]|access-date=2017-04-19}}</ref><ref name='conversation' /> In November 2016, Jarrett held the claim had no reasonable prospects of success and threw out the lawsuit.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://sterlinglawqld.com/identity-politics-political-correctness-and-section-18c-of-the-racial-discrimination-act|title=Identity politics, political correctness and Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act|date=4 August 2017|access-date=26 December 2018|publisher=Sterling Law}}</ref><ref name='conversation'>{{Cite news|url=https://theconversation.com/qut-discrimination-case-exposes-human-rights-commission-failings-68235|title=QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings|last=Forrester, Joshua. Zimmerman, Augusto. Finlay, Lorraine|date=2016-11-07|work=[[The Conversation (website)|The Conversation]]|access-date=2017-04-19}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/nov/04/qut-computer-lab-racial-discrimination-lawsuit-thrown-out |title=QUT computer lab racial discrimination lawsuit thrown out |last=Chan |first=Gabrielle |date=4 November 2016 |website=The Guardian Australia |access-date=4 December 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCCA/2016/2853.html?context=1 |title=Prior v Queensland University of Technology & Ors (No.2) [2016] FCCA 2853 (4 November 2016) |last=Jarrett |first=Michael (judge) |date=4 November 2016 |website=Australasian Legal Information Institute |publisher=[[Australasian Legal Information Institute|AustLII]] |access-date=4 December 2016}}</ref><ref name='smh2'>{{Cite news|url=http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/gillian-triggs-hits-back-at-deeply-misleading-malcolm-turnbull-over-18c-claims-20161107-gsjun8.html|title=Gillian Triggs hits back at 'deeply misleading' Malcolm Turnbull over 18C claims|last=Gordon|first=Michael|date=2016-11-07|work=[[Sydney Morning Herald]]|access-date=2017-04-19}}</ref> |
||
== References == |
== References == |
Latest revision as of 09:47, 17 October 2023
Michael Jarrett is a Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.[1] He was previously a Judge of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia until its merger with the Family Court of Australia. Before then, he was a Federal Magistrate of the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia, before it was named the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. Jarrett has presided over a variety of cases, including family law, administrative law, bankruptcy, copyright, human rights, industrial law, and trade practices. Prior to being a judge, Jarrett was a barrister.
In 2016, Jarrett decided an action involving three Queensland University of Technology (QUT) students who were accused of racial vilification under Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth).[2] [3] One of the students was alleged to have breached Section 18C because of a Facebook post which read: "Just got kicked out of the unsigned Indigenous computer room. QUT stopping segregation with segregation."[4][5] In November 2016, Jarrett held the claim had no reasonable prospects of success and threw out the lawsuit.[6][5][7][8][9]
References
[edit]- ^ "Appointments to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)". Our ministers – Attorney-General’s portfolio. 15 October 2021. Retrieved 30 January 2022.
- ^ "Identity politics, political correctness and Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act". Sterling Law. 4 August 2017. Retrieved 26 December 2018.
- ^ "President of the Australian Human Rights Commission facing possible defamation action". ABC News. 9 November 2016. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
- ^ "Lawyer criticises Gillian Triggs as 18C university case thrown out". SBS World News. 4 November 2016. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
- ^ a b Forrester, Joshua. Zimmerman, Augusto. Finlay, Lorraine (7 November 2016). "QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings". The Conversation. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "Identity politics, political correctness and Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act". Sterling Law. 4 August 2017. Retrieved 26 December 2018.
- ^ Chan, Gabrielle (4 November 2016). "QUT computer lab racial discrimination lawsuit thrown out". The Guardian Australia. Retrieved 4 December 2016.
- ^ Jarrett, Michael (judge) (4 November 2016). "Prior v Queensland University of Technology & Ors (No.2) [2016] FCCA 2853 (4 November 2016)". Australasian Legal Information Institute. AustLII. Retrieved 4 December 2016.
- ^ Gordon, Michael (7 November 2016). "Gillian Triggs hits back at 'deeply misleading' Malcolm Turnbull over 18C claims". Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
This article needs additional or more specific categories. (January 2022) |